We show that solving the Hicksian equilibrium inequalities is equivalent to solving an NP-hard minimization problem.
Thus Rob Pike's statement is misleading, as it suggests ignoring a problem is equivalent to solving it.
We show that solving the dual Walrsian equilibrium inequalities is equivalent to solving a NP-hard minimization problem.
We show that solving the dual Walrasian equilibrium inequalities is equivalent to solving a NP-hard minimization problem.
This problem is equivalent to solving a Monge Ampère equation on the unit sphere.
The algorithm is equivalent to solving the time evolution of the spatially inhomogeneous master equation.
This is equivalent to solving simultaneously any two of the equations x2 = ay, y2 = 2ax, and xy = 2a2, which correspond to two parabolas and a hyperbola, respectively.
Minimizing the quadratic from the x-step is equivalent to solving a system of linear equations composed of structured matrices, all of which represent convolutions.
We will show that the proposed micro-filter is equivalent to solving an inverse problem for parameterizing differential equations.
Finding an optimal mechanism in a standard adverse selection model is equivalent to solving an infinite dimensional linear program.
Newton and Leibniz discovered that integrating f(x) is equivalent to solving a differential equation i.e., finding a function F t) so that F′(t) = f(t).
