Sentence examples for equivalent incomes from inspiring English sources

While GDP allows economists to compare equivalent incomes, it does not account for some of the human factors that may be included in a definition of standard of living.

There are 21.9% of children in household with equivalent incomes below 50% of the nation median in the United States, compared to 15.4% in the United Kingdom (UNICEF, 2005).

And the cost of living varies by region, leaving people with equivalent incomes with somewhat greater or lesser amounts of discretionary income depending on where they reside.

3 Consequently, the approach, its concept and choice of indicators are predominantly guided by data availability and practical operationalization and child poverty is defined as the proportion of children with equivalent incomes below the threshold of 50% of national median equivalent income (Corak 2006b).

The univariate analysis in this study, as well as the multivariate analyses in models 1 and 2 that simultaneously included years of education and annual equivalent income, showed significantly higher likelihood of falling in both people with few years of education and those with low annual equivalent incomes.

As the ages of household members were not available consistently across all studies, it was not possible to calculate the equivalent income according to the OECD equivalence scale.

Income was converted to 'household equivalent income' using the modified Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Dequivalence(OECD) equivalence scales which apply a scale of 1 to the first adult in a household, 0.5 to the second and later adults, and 0.3 to children [ 35].

In order to account for different household compositions, household income is transformed into equivalent income, by using the square root equivalence scale (OECD 2006); the equivalent income is then divided by the PPP (purchasing power parity) index provided in SHARE, which adjusts for different purchasing power across countries.

Even at equivalent income levels, gaps remain large.

The approach is based on the sensible idea that in order to spend one needs an equivalent income.

This hubris is enshrined in the credit-rating system, which will rate someone with no debt lower than someone of equivalent income who has piles of debt but makes the payments regularly.