equivalent between

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "equivalent between" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; instead, "equivalent to" or "equivalent among" would be more appropriate depending on the context. Example: "The two methods are equivalent to each other in terms of efficiency."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Heart rate and fluid loss were equivalent between treatments.

Nature

Improvement in dysphagia was equivalent between the two treatment groups.

Nature

Complication rates are equivalent between the two procedures.

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Furthermore, probe trial performance (memory component) was equivalent between naïve WTs vs. KOs (Fig. 5B).

Nature

Welch's correction was used where the variance was not equivalent between groups.

Nature

Furthermore, CpG-level methylation estimates (β-values) were equivalent between methods (R2 = 0.79, p < 0.00001; Fig. 1e).

Nature

The validity effect in endogenous and exogenous cueing conditions was equivalent between treatments and across time points.

Nature

Behavioral performance and activation of the FFA were equivalent between groups.

Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Moreover, the quantities of newly formed bone are equivalent between the two protocols.

Implantodontie

Importantly, these reductions in cell growth were equivalent between imatinib-resistant and imatinib-sensitive GIST cell lines.

Stanford University

The concentrations of calcium, chloride, sodium and strontium are statistically equivalent between the two fluids.

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Opt for "equivalent to" or "equivalent for" to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity in your writing. For example, instead of "the results were equivalent between the groups", use "the results were equivalent to those of the other groups".

Common error

Avoid using "between" when comparing more than two items. "Between" is typically used for two distinct items or groups. For multiple comparisons, consider rephrasing to use "among" or "across", or restructure the sentence for better clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "equivalent between" functions as an adjective phrase attempting to describe a state of equality or correspondence shared by multiple entities. However, as Ludwig AI points out, its grammatical correctness is questionable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

67%

Academia

15%

News & Media

8%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

7%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "equivalent between" is frequently used, but Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. Its intended meaning is to express equality or correspondence among multiple items. Despite its common appearance, especially in scientific and academic writing, using "equivalent to", "equivalent for", or other alternatives like "comparable to" and "equal to" improves grammatical accuracy and clarity. Remember to use "between" for comparisons involving two items and "among" for more than two.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

equivalent to

Substitutes 'between' with 'to' to denote direct equivalence or correspondence.

equal to

Uses 'equal' instead of 'equivalent' to express that two things are the same in value or measure.

the same as

Replaces 'equivalent' with 'the same' to express that two things are identical in nature or quality.

comparable to

Employs 'comparable' to suggest that two things share similar qualities or characteristics.

equivalent for

Replaces 'between' with 'for' to indicate equivalence in a specific context or purpose.

similar to

Utilizes 'similar' to indicate a resemblance or likeness between two things, without necessarily implying complete equivalence.

corresponding to

Highlights a direct relationship or parallel between two things, indicating a form of equivalence in terms of connection or association.

interchangeable with

Indicates that two things can be used in place of each other without affecting the outcome.

on par with

Suggests that two things are at the same level or standard, implying equivalence in terms of quality or performance.

consistent with

Suggests that two things align or agree with each other, implying a degree of equivalence in terms of compatibility.

FAQs

Is it grammatically correct to say "equivalent between"?

No, the phrase "equivalent between" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct phrasing is usually "equivalent to" or "equivalent for", depending on the context. For instance, "the value is "equivalent to" the other value".

What's a better way to phrase a comparison than using "equivalent between"?

Instead of "equivalent between", you can use phrases such as "comparable to", "equal to", or "similar to". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

How does "equivalent to" differ from "equivalent for"?

"Equivalent to" indicates a direct correspondence or equality in value, amount, meaning or force (i.e the result is "equivalent to" other result). "Equivalent for" suggests that something serves the same purpose or function (i.e the substitute is "equivalent for" the original component).

When should I use "among" instead of "between" in comparisons?

Use "between" when you are comparing only two distinct items or groups (i.e the difference is "between A and B"). Use "among" when you are comparing three or more items (i.e the differences are "among A, B and C").