The phrase 'equipment validation' is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in the context of testing and certifying equipment to make sure it meets certain standards before being put into use. For example, "The manufacturing company hired an independent supplier to perform the equipment validation before the machines were used on the production line."
The next step in the equipment validation process is to plug in the equipment, hook it up, and run tests to see that each switch or user-controllable option does what it is supposed to do.
Moreover, at times this study followed the current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) regulations particularly in terms of equipment validation and documentation.
By contrast, two other institutions noted that they obtained institutional funding for equipment acquisition but not the resources for recruitment, staff training, or equipment validation in order to get NGS operational.
The number of routine care patient examinations with 68Ga radiopharmaceuticals is still relatively limited, probably caused by the presumed need for large investments in hot cells, automated synthesis modules, laboratory equipment and validation efforts.
The advantages of this method relative to preparation by extrusion are economic: a reduced processing time, fewer manufacturing steps, less equipment, less process validation and reduced labour costs.
Besides, the design of evaporators for some heat pumping applications, where temperatures are set at higher values as compared to usual evaporating temperatures in air-conditioning equipment, requires proper validation of the computing methods.
Most of the enforcement laboratories have today already a (costly) qPCR platform in place, but many of these novel technologies may require additional investments in new equipment, in technology validation, and in logistic support.
For example, inaccurate outcomes from HER2-immunohistochemical tests can occur due to issues with fixation, assay validation, equipment calibration, testing reagents, and interpretation criteria, leading to both false-positive and false-negative results [ 3, 4].
What will validation validate?
Studies using manikin technology (130/320; 41%) are distinguished as skills/performance studies (76; 58%) and studies focused on the use, testing, and validation of equipment (52; 40%).
