Exact(1)
The most common equipment incident was faulty equipment, which accounted for 113 CIs (33.4%); unfamiliarity or incorrect use of equipment accounted for 72 CIs (21.3%); disconnection and leaks accounted for 65 CIs (19.2%); and lack of equipment or unavailability of equipment accounted for 64 CIs (18.9%).
Similar(59)
Examples of equipment incidents during this phase included failure of the transport trolley and its monitor.
With univariate analysis, these equipment-related incidents affecting the patient were associated with: number of infusion pumps, duration of CT scan, duration of transport, incidents with airway equipment, and incidents with infusion pumps.
Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis was done on the EDAX system (Zeiss X-flash detector analyzer, associated with SEM equipment) using incident electron beam energies of 20 kV, operating at WD 9.0 mm for the determination of the chemical composition of the deposited ITO films.
Patient falls are more frequently reported than medication errors, equipment related incidents, and documentation errors [ 1].
This report investigates the incidence of equipment-related incidents within an ICU of a large inner-city hospital.
Equipment-related incidents represented the majority of incidents, but AE with an impact on the patient still occurred in 26% of IHT, which is similar to literature data (17-33% of transports) [9 11, 19].
Equipment-related incidents represented the majority of incidents, but AE with an impact on the patient still occurred in 26% of IHT, which is similar to literature data 17-333% of transports) [ 9- 19] 19].
By identifying the major sources of equipment-related incidents, appropriate training schemes can be developed to avoid such incidents in the future in order to improve patient safety.
Equipment-related incidents were the most frequently reported (a total of 338 incidents).
Serious adverse events were defined as falls and incidents related to equipment failure or incidents related to treatment leading to injury requiring a hospital or GP visit.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com