Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(22)
The equation is valid for laminar, mixed convection conditions in vertical, internal, aiding flows with constant wall temperature boundary condition.
It is proved that the creep-type constitutive equation is valid for the simulation of stress relaxation.
The equation is valid for rectangular columns with doubly symmetric reinforcement and both normal and high strength concrete, and also for short-term and sustained loads.
This equation is valid for oxygen inlet pressures of as low as 1 mbar and has further been tested in a balance of methane of up to pCH4 = 10 bar (abs.).
The equation is valid for temperatures from the triple point to 460 K, and pressures up to 70 MPa, and it behaves in a qualitatively rational manner even in the region far from the range of existing experimental data.
This equation is valid for subcritical fluids as well.
Similar(38)
These equations are valid for any geometry of the unit cell and arbitrary cross-sectional form of the cylinders.
It is shown that these equations are valid for any stationary random excitations if the system attains the steady state.
The equations are valid for aqueous solutions saturated with hydrogen at low values of the Reynolds number.
It is shown that the equations are valid for materials on free surface and in position where the residual stress reaches maximum value.
It is shown that the equations are valid for an electrode which is uniformly accessible to the electroactive species in solution.
More suggestions(17)
computation is valid for
factor is valid for
expression is valid for
relation is valid for
situation is valid for
form is valid for
estimate is valid for
solution is valid for
calculation is valid for
consideration is valid for
correlation is valid for
balance is valid for
relationship is valid for
model is valid for
equations is valid for
equation is applicable for
equation is effective for
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com