Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(7)
The quadratic equation achieved the best results, with correlation coefficients (r) 0.9879 and 0.9569 for calibration and validation steps, respectively.
The proposed equation achieved the target reliability index with an improved test-to-prediction capacity ratio over a wide range of angle geometric parameters when compared with AISC design equations.
The whole coefficients of Redlich Kister equation achieved for the prediction properties of excess molar volume, viscosity deviation, deviation of the excess Gibbs free energy, and surface tension for the studied mixture are listed in Table 8.
21 Our previous study indicated that the CKD-EPIscr-cys equation achieved ideal accuracy in nonelderly individuals with normally or mildly injured GFR.
Amongst older people the MDRD equation achieved a P30 of 81% compared with 86% for the CKD-EPIcystatin and creatinine C equation [ 27].
The CKD-EPI creatinine cystatin C equation achieved the optimal scores (6.0 versus a range from 1.0 2.0 for the other equations).
Similar(53)
The proposed equation achieves a good estimation for the compressive strength of the vertical inner plate reinforced joint.
It is, of course, possible to fit the mutational pattern with nonlinear combinations of many parameters (e.g., a 35-parameter nonlinear equation achieves an 80% predictive value), but the biological meaning of such complex combinations of parameters is not obvious.
In this regard, Lorenz chaotic system based on differential equations achieved more recognition because of its fundamental sensitivity to initial conditions and easiness in use.
Under circumstances of rGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m and age ≥80 years, none of the equations achieved ideal accuracy.
Three CKD-EPI equations performed not as well as previously expected, while two Japanese equations achieved the worst performance of all employed equations in our study (Table 3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com