Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
His explications of scientific concepts can be equally reductionist, as when he mentions "edge effect".
It was little wonder it resonated, and Richman's contempt for his enemies spoke to my equally reductionist view of the world.
Similar(57)
Dawkins, the consummate Oxford scientist, sees science as an all-encompassing reductionist program; Gould, a polymath equally comfortable writing about such disparate subjects as DiMaggio-era baseball and Cambrian-era trilobites, takes a more limited view of science as on a par with other modes of knowledge.
People used to call the Dawkins approach "reductionist", as if that were a synonym for heartless.
Since reductions are always provisional, the data can surprise the anti-reductionists as much as it can the reductionists.
As noted, Lewis is a reductionist about modal facts themselves.
But because of the availability of fully developed theories of intervals along with fully developed interval-based semantics [Cresswell 1979; Dowty 1979], and because of equally well worked out traditional theories of instants and instant-based semantics [Prior 1967], such accounts are especially attractive from a reductionist perspective.
They're hugely reductionist.
Jung considered Freud too reductionist.
Touchstone is a rancid reductionist.
Or maybe that's too reductionist?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com