equally erratic as

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "equally erratic as" is not correct in standard English; it should be "equally erratic to" or "as erratic as." You can use it when comparing the erratic nature of two subjects, but it needs to be rephrased for grammatical accuracy.
Example: "The weather in April is as erratic as the weather in March."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

However, they are equally erratic at the back, so what happens when so many of those factors combine all at the one time?

The Guardian - Sport

Still, Mohammed Hafeez's side were equally inept against India – indeed they posted a lower total – but, as shown with their win over Australia, are as erratic as ever.

The Guardian - Sport

The government's pursuit was as erratic as its quarry.

The New York Times

— Sergio García's play was as erratic as the weather Thursday at the United States Open.

The New York Times - Sports

"As erratic as I was, I kind of took us out of the game," he said.

The New York Times - Sports

The differences looked just as erratic as they did before introducing the macro-level indicators.

European Journal of Population

The actor was equally erratic on Twitter; his bizarre tweets, often referring to his "tigerblood" and decorated with the hashtag #winning, amassed more than two million followers.

The Guardian

But Mr Morsi has proven equally erratic and domineering.

The Economist

The progress of our diplomacy has been equally erratic.

The New York Times

Equally erratic is the form of the story.

The Guardian - Books

For other domestic problems, Mr. Chávez's approach has been equally erratic.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "equally erratic as". Instead, use grammatically correct alternatives like "just as erratic as" or "similarly erratic to".

Common error

Do not use "equally erratic as" in your writing. This phrase is grammatically incorrect. Opt for alternatives such as "as erratic as" or "equally erratic to" to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "equally erratic as" functions as an incorrect comparative adverbial phrase. Ludwig AI indicates that this construction does not follow standard grammar rules. It attempts to compare the degree of erratic behavior or characteristics between two subjects, but it's not grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "equally erratic as" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in both formal and informal writing. As highlighted by Ludwig AI, more appropriate alternatives include "just as erratic as" or "similarly erratic to". While the intent of the phrase is to compare erratic behavior, its flawed construction undermines effective communication. There are no exact examples of this phrase being used in reliable sources. Therefore, prioritize grammatical accuracy by using the suggested alternatives to convey your intended meaning clearly and correctly.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

just as erratic as

Emphasizes similarity in erratic nature.

similarly erratic to

Highlights a resemblance in erratic behavior.

equally unpredictable as

Replaces 'erratic' with 'unpredictable' to maintain a similar meaning.

as inconsistent as

Substitutes 'erratic' with 'inconsistent' for a variation in word choice.

no less erratic than

Emphasizes that something is not less erratic compared to something else.

as unstable as

Uses 'unstable' as an alternative to 'erratic'.

equally fluctuating as

Replaces 'erratic' with 'fluctuating' to convey the idea of irregular changes.

just as changeable as

Emphasizes the changing nature, similar to 'erratic'.

similarly capricious to

Uses 'capricious' to indicate unpredictable and impulsive behavior.

as irregular as

Replaces 'erratic' with 'irregular', focusing on the lack of consistency.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say something is equally erratic?

The correct way to express that something is equally erratic is to say "just as erratic as" or "similarly erratic to". The phrase "equally erratic as" is grammatically incorrect.

Is "equally erratic as" grammatically correct?

No, "equally erratic as" is not grammatically correct. Standard English usage requires phrases like "just as erratic as" or "similarly erratic to".

What can I say instead of "equally erratic as"?

You can use phrases such as "just as erratic as", "similarly erratic to", or "as erratic as" to convey a similar meaning while maintaining correct grammar.

What's the difference between "equally erratic as" and "as erratic as"?

"Equally erratic as" is not grammatically correct, while "as erratic as" is a standard English construction used to compare the erratic nature of two subjects. Therefore, it's better to avoid the former.