equality of outcome

USAGE SUMMARY

'equality of outcome' is a correct phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to a situation in which a group of people have achieved equal results or outcomes, such as the same income, education level, or rights. For example, "The government has implemented several policies to promote equality of outcome in the workplace."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

We want equal opportunity, not equality of outcome.

Huffington Post

Two main dimensions exist: equality of opportunity, achieved through procedural justice that treats equals the same; and equality of outcome, achieved through substantive justice that treats unequals differently according to their initial endowments or privileges.

Globalization and Health

That's the model our ancestors left to come create an opportunity society, equality of opportunity, equal protection of the law -- not equality of outcome.

Huffington Post

(A version of this objection can be lodged by advocates of any type of doctrine of equality of outcome against any type of doctrine of equal opportunity for outcomes).

SEP

Nobody seriously advocates equality of outcome.

The Guardian - Opinion

Does equality mean equality of outcome?

The Guardian

If you want to define "equality" as equality of outcome then I agree.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

The Old Labour fixation on equality of outcomes was replaced by a new notion of "equal worth".

The Economist

For instance, subgroups of the first partition consist of equally deserving individuals, for which one would like to obtain equality of outcomes, whereas subgroups of the second partition consist of individuals who have equal opportunities, so that inequalities among them do not matter.

SEP

"The truth is governments have never been able to achieve equality of outcomes.

The Guardian

What we need now is a commitment to a much greater – and universal – equality of outcomes.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing social policies, clarify whether you are advocating for "equality of outcome" or "equality of opportunity", as they represent distinct philosophical approaches.

Common error

Avoid using "equality of outcome" interchangeably with "equity". "Equality of outcome" focuses on achieving the same results for everyone, while equity recognizes different needs and may involve different levels of support to achieve fair results.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "equality of outcome" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as the object of a preposition or as a subject complement. It names a concept related to social justice and fairness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Science

15%

Encyclopedias

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "equality of outcome" is a frequently used term in discussions about social justice, economics, and political ideologies. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely employed across various domains, particularly in news, media, science, and encyclopedias. It is important to differentiate "equality of outcome" from "equality of opportunity", as the former aims for similar results for all individuals, while the latter focuses on providing equal chances. When using this phrase, ensure clarity and consider whether it aligns with the intended message, especially when discussing policies and strategies. Related terms like "equal outcomes" and "equitable results" offer nuanced alternatives depending on the specific context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

equal outcomes

This alternative simplifies the phrase by removing 'of', focusing directly on the equality of results.

parity in results

Replaces 'equality' with 'parity', stressing the equivalence or balance in the outcomes achieved.

equitable results

Replaces "equality" with "equitable", shifting the focus to fairness and justice in the results achieved.

equalized achievements

Focuses on achievements that have been made equal, often through intervention or policy.

uniform outcomes

Emphasizes the sameness of the results, suggesting a standardization or lack of variation.

balanced achievements

Suggests a state where achievements are proportionately distributed, implying a sense of equilibrium.

consistent results

Highlights the predictability and reliability of the results, implying a stable pattern.

standardized results

Highlights the uniformity of the outcomes, often achieved through specific standards or benchmarks.

level playing field results

This phrase implies fair competition leading to similar achievements.

homogenous results

Focuses on the similarity and lack of diversity among the results obtained.

FAQs

What is the difference between "equality of outcome" and equality of opportunity?

"Equality of opportunity" focuses on providing everyone with the same chances, while "equality of outcome" aims for everyone to achieve the same results, regardless of their starting point. "Equality of opportunity" seeks a fair starting point, whereas "equality of outcome" seeks similar endpoints.

How can I use "equality of outcome" in a sentence?

You can use "equality of outcome" to describe policies or goals aimed at ensuring everyone achieves similar results. For example, "The new social program aims to promote "equality of outcome" in education by providing additional resources to disadvantaged schools."

What are some alternatives to saying "equality of outcome"?

Alternatives to "equality of outcome" include "equal outcomes", "equitable results", or "parity in results". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Why is "equality of outcome" often debated in political discourse?

"Equality of outcome" is often debated because it raises questions about the role of government intervention, individual responsibility, and the potential trade-offs between equality and economic efficiency. Some argue it requires excessive intervention, while others see it as necessary for social justice.