equality of number of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "equality of number of" is not commonly used in written English and may sound awkward.
It can be used in mathematical or statistical contexts when discussing the equal count of items or elements in different sets. Example: "The equality of number of participants in both groups ensures a fair comparison in the study."

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

χ for equality of number of male and female dominant markers = 1.729 χ for equality of number of male and female distorted markers = 0.077 Tabulated χ for degrees of freedom = 1 is 3.84 at P = 0.95 level of significance.

BMC Plant Biology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The proportion, approximately 14 boys for every 13 girls, was perfectly calculated, given the greater dangers to which young men are exposed in their search for food, to bring the sexes to an equality of numbers at the age of marriage.

Encyclopedia Britannica

If Obama were to take a clear stance in favor of marriage equality, the number of undecided voters in swing states who were otherwise ready to support the African-American Democrat who has been called a socialist and anti-American in the right wing media for most of his first term would be quite small.

Huffington Post

Equality of the number of exons and the equality of the number of whole genes (introns plus exons) on two strands implies the equality of the number of introns.

Plosone

We found that this equality originates from the equality of the number of genes on different strands that, in some cases, takes place even if the values of cumulative GC and AT skews are not well correlated (Figure 2 and Table S1).

Plosone

Because of this equality in the number of positively and negatively charged constituent particles, the atom as a whole is electrically uncharged.

Encyclopedia Britannica

A wide-ranging review by the commission of racial equality in a number of areas, including education, jobs, pay and health, revealed a worrying combination of post-Brexit hate crime and entrenched long-term systemic unfairness, he said.

The Guardian

We've come a long way in terms of gender equality, but the number of women in positions of power remain low.

Forbes

There is increasing pressure for the implementation of marriage equality: an increasing number of states are granting same-sex marriages, there is a large and growing segment of the population that supports marriage equality, and courts have become more willing to strike down discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people.

Huffington Post

The PARAFAC model is a simple model, which comes with a restriction of the equality on the number of components in each mode which makes it difficult to fit a data array with the PARAFAC model.

BMC Genomics

For applications to intuitionistic arithmetic, normal models (those in which equality is interpreted by identity at each node) suffice because equality of natural numbers is decidable.

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, consider using more common phrases such as "equal number of" or "same number of" instead of "equality of number of". This can enhance readability, especially in less formal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "equality of number of" in casual conversation or informal writing. It can sound stilted or unnatural. Opt for simpler alternatives like "same number" or "equal amount".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "equality of number of" functions as a noun phrase, specifying that two or more sets, groups or values have the same number of elements, members or quantity. While grammatically sound, Ludwig suggests that simpler alternatives are preferable.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

25%

Encyclopedias

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Academia

10%

Wiki

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "equality of number of" is grammatically correct but considered less common than alternatives like "equal number of" or "same number of". While acceptable, it can sound overly formal in everyday language. It primarily functions to emphasize equal counts across different sets or categories. According to Ludwig AI, simpler phrasing is often preferred for clarity. It's most frequently encountered in scientific, news, and encyclopedic contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

same number of

A more common and direct way to express equality in count.

identical number of

Emphasizes that the numbers are exactly the same, leaving no room for variation.

equal quantity of

Replaces "number" with "quantity", focusing on the amount rather than the count.

equivalent number of

Uses "equivalent" to emphasize that the numbers are equal in value or effect.

matching number of

Implies a correspondence or pairing between two sets or groups.

balanced number of

Suggests that the equal number contributes to a sense of equilibrium or fairness.

proportionate number of

Highlights that the numbers are equal relative to some other factor or ratio.

uniform number of

Suggests that the numbers are consistently equal across different instances or categories.

commensurate number of

Uses a more formal term to indicate that the numbers are appropriately equal or proportional.

equal measure of

Shifts from a count to a measurement, suggesting that the amounts are equal in some quantifiable sense.

FAQs

What's a simpler way to say "equality of number of"?

You can use phrases like "equal number of", "same number of", or "equivalent number of" depending on the context. These alternatives are generally more common and easier to understand.

Is "equality of number of" grammatically correct?

Yes, "equality of number of" is grammatically acceptable, but it's not the most common or natural-sounding phrase. Ludwig AI suggests that alternatives like "equal number of" are often preferred for clarity.

When is it appropriate to use "equality of number of"?

While grammatically correct, "equality of number of" may be more appropriate in formal or technical writing where precision is key. In everyday conversation or less formal contexts, simpler alternatives are usually better.

Are there specific contexts where "equality of number of" is preferred over "equal number of"?

While both phrases convey the same meaning, "equality of number of" may be chosen in formal contexts to emphasize the concept of equality itself, rather than just stating that the numbers are the same. However, "equal number of" is generally more widely used.