equal preference for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "equal preference for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing choices or options that are regarded with the same level of importance or favor. Example: "In our selection process, we maintain equal preference for all candidates, regardless of their background."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

17 human-written examples

In contrast, females of the gynogenetic poecilid Poecilia formosa showed an equal preference for a live and video image of a P. mexicana male, suggesting a response to live animals as strong as to video images.

Animal Behaviour

Preliminary analyses of the current study revealed that women and men had equal preference for processing verbal information, but women reported a greater preference for visual information than men.

Fashion and Textiles

Analysis of the C-terminal position relative to the centrally fixed phosphorylated residue shows a very high preference for methionine besides an equal preference for other basic and hydrophobic amino acids at the +1 position.

Plosone

The SRm160 PWI domain has an equal preference for single- and double-stranded nucleic acids [ 15].

Biochemical Journal

ChR2 and ChR2 mice had equal preference for water+laser vs water alone at all stimulation frequencies tested.

eLife

Unstimulated MDA-MB-435 and MDA-MB-231 cell adhered highest to FN, while MCF7 and Hek-293 cells had equal preference for FN, Fg and VN.

BMC Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

To use unweighted counts of dependencies in activities of daily living (ADLs) to assess the impact of functional impairment requires an assumption of equal preferences for each ADL dependency.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

DNMT3a and DNMT3b have equal preferences for hemi-methylated and non-methylated DNA, and so have been classified as de novo methyltransferases [ 8].

BMC Cancer

In contrast, based on the prediction of gain-loss frequency, participants should have roughly equal preferences for decks A and C.

Behavioral and Brain Functions

In the BBDD version, participants exhibited equal preferences for decks B and D (stage 1: t (23) = -0.27, p =.78 (two-tailed); stage 2: t (23) = -0.79, p =.43 (two-tailed)).

Behavioral and Brain Functions

During training phase, vehicle-, and, asarone-treatedated mice showed an equal preference index for the two identical objects (Fig. S6S).

Aging Cell

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "equal preference for", ensure that the context clearly establishes the options being compared. For instance, specify "equal preference for A and B" rather than just "equal preference" to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "equal preference for" when the options being compared are not explicitly stated or are unclear. This can lead to confusion and weaken the clarity of your statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "equal preference for" functions as a descriptor indicating a state of equivalent inclination or favor toward multiple options or choices. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase is usable and correct in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "equal preference for" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression that describes a state where multiple options are viewed with equivalent favor. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. It's frequently used in scientific, news, and business contexts to convey neutrality or impartiality. When using the phrase, ensure clarity by explicitly stating the options being compared. Alternatives such as "identical preference for" and "equivalent preference for" can be used to convey similar meanings. Avoid overgeneralization by always making clear what options are being regarded with "equal preference for".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

identical preference for

Uses "identical" to emphasize the exact sameness of the preference.

equivalent preference for

Replaces "equal" with "equivalent", suggesting a similar degree of likeness in preference.

same preference for

Employs "same" to convey an identical inclination towards something.

equal inclination toward

Substitutes "preference" with "inclination", focusing on a general tendency or leaning.

equal liking for

Uses "liking" instead of "preference", implying a fondness or enjoyment.

equal affinity for

Replaces "preference" with "affinity", indicating a natural connection or attraction.

no discernible preference for

Indicates an absence of preference, suggesting options are viewed as essentially the same.

evenly distributed preference for

Specifies that the preference is spread uniformly across multiple options.

balanced preference for

Implies a state where different options receive approximately the same amount of favor.

indistinguishable preference for

Indicates that the preferences are so close as to be impossible to tell apart.

FAQs

How can I use "equal preference for" in a sentence?

You can use "equal preference for" to indicate that there is no significant difference in the desirability or inclination towards multiple options. For example: "The data showed an "equal preference for" both designs among the test subjects."

What are some alternatives to "equal preference for"?

Some alternatives include "identical preference for", "equivalent preference for", or "same preference for" depending on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "equal preference for"?

Yes, "equal preference for" is grammatically correct and widely used in various forms of writing to express that different choices or options are regarded with the same level of importance or favor.

What does "equal preference for" imply?

"Equal preference for" implies that there is no significant distinction in value or inclination between two or more options. It suggests that all options are considered to be similarly desirable or acceptable.