Sentence examples for equal hazard from inspiring English sources

Null hypothesis H0: The survival functions of LPFS of the two therapies are equal, hazard ratio = 1.

Alternative hypothesis H1: The survival functions of LPFS of the two therapies are not equal, hazard ratio ≠ 1.

This approach, of taking ORs to equal RRs, and RRs to equal hazard ratios (HRs), is widely used in the literature, e.g. [ 16, 34].

Because a HR cannot be calculated for the latter, they were excluded, but of course 0 versus 0 is equal hazard (and not zero information) thus inflating the final difference.

Although a model with six instead of four entered variables is a possible overfit, adding age and SpO2 to the start model resulted in a final model in which delta lactate remained independently associated with in-hospital mortality (with equal hazard ratio, 95% CI and p value, data not shown).

Assuming both the design peak acceleration and the normalized response spectrum are statistically independent random variables, the probability of normalized design response spectrum has to be smaller than that of the peak acceleration, but never be equal-hazard.

The widely-used so-called "equal-hazard (or probability-consistent) response spectrum" does not reflect the physical characteristics of a real spectrum and usually result in overestimation, especially for high arch dams.

(Mean score for assumptions of danger (0 equals no hazard, 10 equals severe danger) was 4.5 (range 0 10) in the less-educated group compared to 3.6 (range 0 8) in the other).

HR-/HER2- tumors were more likely to respond if they showed an increased Ki67 level: a significantly higher pCR rate was seen in tumors with > 20% positive nuclei (63.6% vs. 0%, P < 0.0001, χ2 test), and an increase of 10% of Ki67-labeled tumor cells equaled a hazard ratio of 1.92 (P = 0.006, Table 3).

Assuming, for tractability, T(1) and T(2) to be independent with hazards equal to the cause-specific hazards α01 t) and α02 t), respectively, is computationally correct in that simulation based on this model yields the right data structure.

Specifically, there were increased risks for a migraine attack frequency of less than monthly (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.2 3.1) and greater or equal to weekly (hazard ratio [HR] 4.3; 95% CI 1.4 13.3), but not for monthly migraine attacks [45].