equal comparison

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "equal comparison" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the act of comparing two or more items that are considered to have the same value or status in a particular context. Example: "In this study, we conducted an equal comparison of the two methods to determine which was more effective."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

All the wall systems have the same doors and windows in their bodies for equal comparison of energy efficiency and construction cost.

Energy and Buildings

The analysis also showed the importance of using a honeycomb core's effective properties for equal comparison to foam-cored sandwich structures.

Composites Science and Technology

After identifying 60 scans from low-angle subjects, this number was set as the limit for the number of scans to be consecutively included in the normal- and high-angle groups for equal comparison.

Progress in Orthodontics

Light conversion efficiency is the main concern for PBR with artificial light, however due to varieties in each artificial light optical properties, it is quite difficult to have an equal comparison.

Bioresources and Bioprocessing

That is, Sotomayor did not make an equal comparison.

Huffington Post

My one regret was that I wasn't there when students were doing a mission, so that I could watch and make a more equal comparison.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

The incident fracture rates were equal in comparison to the other studies.

Arthritis Research and Therapy

It is possible that the intervention group scores would be lower if the proportion of fourth year students were equal between comparison groups.

BMC Medical Education

One founder line was studied in detail, in which the relative protein expression level of the PAX3 transgene is nearly equal in comparison to the endogenous protein level in the epidermis of neonatal mice.

Cell Death and Differentiation

The 0.5 % of CMC-Na at the dose of 4 ml · kg−1 was as the drug vehicle control and the dosage of CMC-Na was close to equal in comparison with AEE and ASA groups.

BMC Veterinary Research

The prior for the between trial variance τ, which we assumed to be equal across comparisons, was based on empirical evidence derived from semi-objective outcomes of head to head comparisons 40: a log normal distribution with a geometric mean of τ of 0.04 and a 95% reference range from 0.001 to 1.58.

British Medical Journal

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for an "equal comparison", ensure all factors and variables are controlled or accounted for to avoid skewed results. This is particularly vital in scientific research and data analysis.

Common error

Avoid presuming that a comparison is "equal" without thoroughly validating that all relevant parameters are indeed equivalent. Insufficient validation can lead to misleading conclusions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "equal comparison" functions as a noun phrase, typically used to describe a method or situation where items are compared under equivalent conditions. Ludwig provides examples where this is used in scientific studies and general discussions.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

71%

News & Media

29%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "equal comparison" is deemed grammatically correct by Ludwig and is commonly used across various domains, especially in science and news media. It signifies a comparison made under equivalent conditions to ensure fairness and objectivity. To avoid misinterpretations, it's crucial to validate equality before assuming a comparison is "equal". Alternatives like "fair comparison" or "balanced comparison" can be used to convey similar meanings. Using "equal comparison" implies careful consideration of all factors involved in the comparative process.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

fair comparison

Emphasizes impartiality and justice in the comparison process.

equitable comparison

Highlights the principle of fairness and justness.

balanced comparison

Suggests that all aspects are considered without bias.

standardized comparison

Indicates a comparison based on a uniform set of criteria.

objective comparison

Focuses on eliminating subjective bias from the comparison.

unbiased comparison

Highlights the absence of prejudice or favoritism.

impartial comparison

Stresses neutrality and detachment in the evaluation.

level playing field comparison

Implies that the conditions are the same for everything being compared.

commensurate comparison

Highlights that the items being compared are of similar type and scale.

uniform comparison

Indicates the comparison is carried out using the exact same method for all items.

FAQs

What does "equal comparison" mean in research?

In research, "equal comparison" signifies that the items or groups being compared are assessed under the same conditions, using the same metrics, and controlling for confounding variables. This ensures that any observed differences are due to the factors being studied rather than extraneous influences.

How can I ensure an "equal comparison" in an experiment?

To ensure an "equal comparison" in an experiment, standardize procedures, use the same instruments and protocols for all groups, control for extraneous variables, and randomize participants or subjects to different conditions. Blinding can also help minimize bias.

What are some alternatives to "equal comparison"?

You can use alternatives like "fair comparison", "balanced comparison", or "standardized comparison" depending on the context.

Why is it important to make an "equal comparison"?

Making an "equal comparison" is crucial for drawing valid and reliable conclusions. When comparisons are not equal, any observed differences may be attributable to confounding factors rather than the variables of interest, leading to inaccurate inferences.