Results show that our approach is 3 times and 90 times faster than the epoch-difference approach and the zero-difference approach, respectively, which demonstrates a significant improvement in the computation efficiency.
We adapt the Satellite-specific Epoch-differenced Ionospheric Delay model (SEID) for GPS networks with mixed single- and dual-frequency receivers.
Using a satellite-difference and epoch-difference method, Li et al. (2010) and Chen et al. (2013) demonstrated a horizontal accuracy of 5 cm using hourly observations in the static mode and 3D precision of 10 cm after 20-min convergence time in the kinematic mode.
To enable tropospheric delay estimation for the low-cost L1-only receiver, the ionospheric delay for the GRED station was interpolated from the three surrounding dual-frequency stations (namely COMO, NOVR, and MILA) by applying the Satellite-specific Epoch-differenced Ionospheric Delay (SEID) algorithm (Deng et al. 2009).
During selected sleep stage 2 epochs, differences of ERP amplitudes between trial types (rareKC, rarew/oKC, frequent) were significant for components N1, P2, P450, N550 and P900, all p-values<0.001 p-values<0.001ficand for N350 and MMN.
The between-epoch single difference ionospheric delays from a medium scale dense GPS network are used to estimate the parameter of the MSTID e.g. amplitude, wavelength and velocity.
Concerning the provisional IGRF model for epoch 2010.0, differences in how teams forward propagated their estimates from mid-2009 to 2010.0, depending on the nature of the time-dependence of their parent models, was an additional source of variation between the candidates.
Differences in bout length subsided between epochs, but differences in bout-initiation rate were exacerbated.
The consecutive time points necessary to indicate an epoch of significant difference between the responses to the standards and deviants were obtained from a simulation using an autocorrelation estimated from the data (34 for stimulus combination A and 18 for stimulus combination B).
When comparing these iso-rigidity contours with those determined for Epoch 2000, large differences are found, particularly in the Atlantic Ocean region.
Comparison of models SACFM-2 a and CHAOS-6 b at epoch 2008.0, their differences are shown in the third row c and last row d at 0.8 and 350 km altitudes, respectively.
