The divergence of HIFLEX and LOFLEX could represent different adaptations to environments differing in mean quality and variability, or indicate that a genetic polymorphism of reproductive investment reaction norms has evolved under a physiological tradeoff between reproductive investment flexibility and adult lifespan.
This difference suggests that gut environments differ in their selectivity/hospitability for bacterial proliferation.
Nevertheless, our findings highlight the existence of differences in ideal plant-type for environments differing in N availability to be considered in maize breeding programs.
In addition, EOs from plants growing in varied environments differ in their composition and hence have different uses.
In this paper, we consider the problem of obtaining comparable protocol performance when the test and deployment environments differ in RF propagation environment and/or inter-node spacing.
The regularities presented above, showing similar behavior in environments differing in the language used, cultural heritage of authors, topics of posts, presence of extended discussions between users, and emotional content of messages suggest existence of an underlying universal mechanism of a general nature.
We recorded the foraging behavior and declared motivational states of the subjects in various environments differing in terms of the resource distributions among patches.
In addition, however, environments differ in their relevance to overall fitness: some environmental factors may strongly influence fitness, whereas others may have only a weak influence on fitness.
An adaptive radiation comprises a group of species that inhabit a variety of environments, differ in morphological and other traits important in utilizing these environments, and are descended from a common ancestor that rapidly speciated over a short period of time [1].
To this end, we propagated 42 populations of Escherichia coli for 2000 generations in 7 defined environments differing in resource identity, number, and presentation.
