The phrase "entirely liable" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It means fully responsible or accountable for something. Example: The company's CEO was found to be entirely liable for the embezzlement of funds, resulting in their resignation and potential legal consequences.
This would have led to a situation where Indian victims and taxpayers were entirely liable for an accident, with no way of holding the supplier to account.
In early February, the government of Prime Minister Paul Martin announced that it would appeal a lower British Columbia court ruling that held the national government entirely liable for a local residential school settlement.
Instead it told him that a clause in its small print makes him entirely liable for the damage, and as a result it has the right to charge him the full cost of the engine rebuild, plus a host of other associated costs.
In the face of the current race to hoard strategic resources including sun, shadow, and wind the time is past to wonder what will become of Dubai, with its new city entirely liable to the Arab Emirates, or, on a smaller and nearer scale, what will become of the large urban areas to be renewed, with their announced plans, and approved volumes, and uncertain but doubtless lengthy timetables.
California law makes utilities entirely liable for damage caused by wildfires sparked by their equipment, even if the utility isn't found to be negligent.
"Even though legitimate questions have been raised about certain conduct of the tobacco companies," he said, that does not mean that they are entirely and solely liable for smokers' injuries.
Only publishers can be liable.
A defense lawyer (who was also an ex-prosecutor) told me once that we could eliminate police torture entirely by making individual cops personally financially liable for any proved cases.
In an order dated Saturday, Judge Richard J. Sullivan of United States District Court in Manhattan ruled that ReDigi was liable for copyright infringement, and seemed entirely unmoved by ReDigi's arguments.
Unless the promisor can prove that a breach of contract has been caused in a way entirely outside his sphere of risk, he is liable for damages.
So even if it can be shown that the policy for identifying prisoners was inadequate, it's entirely possible that state officials would not be held liable for locking up the wrong person".
