Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
After the 47th period, we observe a substantial increase in the number of non-vulnerable patient enrolments (p <0.001), whereas the number of vulnerable patients enrolled through GACOs increased only slightly (p <0.001).
Similar(59)
During the run-in period, HbA1c decreased in both treatment arms from approximately 9.5% at enrolment to about 9.3% at randomization (Tables 2 and 3), (p<0.05 compared to enrolment; p = 0.267 between treatment arms).
There was no difference between groups regarding glandular ulcer score at enrolment (p?=?0.72).
Mortality was not associated with shock requiring inotropic support at enrolment (p = 0.83) or gastrointestinal surgery (p = 0.05).
None of the pre-specified interactions were significant, with the results consistent across age groups (P = 0.71), HSV-2 status at enrolment (P = 0.61) and centre (P = 0.59).
In contrast, intervention patients in Rabow 2004 experienced better sleep quality than controls six to 12 months after enrolment (P value = 0.05), after controlling for baseline differences.
The IUs with at most two years of enrolment in the NHIS reported better choice of provider than those with at least two years of enrolment (p = 0.001; impact = 1.62).
IUs with up to two years of enrolment in the NHIS reported better autonomy as compared to those with at least two years of enrolment (p = 0.019; impact = 1.39).
The positive association of parity with renal cell cancer was limited to women 50 59 years old at enrolment (P for interaction=0.11) and to never smokers (P for interaction <0.005).
Septic shock patients had significantly more interphase neutrophils compared to sepsis patients without shock, both on the day of enrolment (P = 0.02 Figure 1B) and on day 2 (P = 0.05 Figure 1B).
Hughes 1992 found fewer VA outpatient clinic visits in the intervention group than in the control group (mean 0.73 and 2.59 visits, respectively in the six months following enrolment; P value = 0.01) but no difference in non-VA ambulatory care visits (mean 0.00 and 0.16 visits, respectively; "n.s". [not significant]).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com