enormous liability

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "enormous liability" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a significant risk or responsibility that could lead to negative consequences, often in a legal or financial context. Example: "The company faced an enormous liability after the product recall, which affected its reputation and finances."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

Mr. Bloomberg has called the corporate refunds an "enormous liability".

The New York Times

Mr Gordon said: "This ruling opens up an enormous liability in the UK and elsewhere.

Independent

That could potentially expose firms to enormous liability even if their managers were not specifically aware of any legal violations.

The New York Times

"I think the university could have enormous liability, including Boeheim, who was in a supervisory capacity," Dowd said.

The New York Times - Sports

The conclusions of the 854-page, two-volume report may not be particularly surprising, considering the enormous liability in civil lawsuits and possible federal criminal charges.

The New York Times

Many experts who have looked at the financial strength of BP said its ability to handle enormous liability claims should not be underestimated.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

43 human-written examples

"We are saddling future generations with enormous liabilities".

The New York Times

And the airlines are hundreds of times bigger than Amtrak, he said, so offering guarantees could mean enormous liabilities.

The New York Times - Travel

As plants have changed hands, critics of nuclear power have expressed concern that a few utilities are acquiring enormous liabilities in buying reactors.

The New York Times

Those receiving the money are ­trying to unravel enormous liabilities that have forced the insurance company to accept four government bailouts totalling $150bn.

The Guardian - Business

Chait also argues that I make it sound like he "was wildly bullish on Newt Gingrich's prospects" when in fact he always recognized Gingrich's enormous liabilities as a candidate.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "enormous liability", ensure the context clearly specifies what the liability pertains to (e.g., financial, legal, ethical) to avoid ambiguity. For example: "The company faces an "enormous liability" regarding environmental damage claims."

Common error

Avoid using "enormous liability" as a generic term for any problem. Always provide specifics about the nature and scope of the liability to maintain clarity and precision in your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "enormous liability" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "enormous" modifies the noun "liability". It serves to emphasize the significant scale or extent of the responsibility or obligation. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

2.5%

Reference

2.5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "enormous liability" is a commonly used phrase that effectively communicates a significant risk or responsibility, particularly in financial or legal contexts. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and widely accepted. While versatile, it is crucial to specify the nature of the liability to avoid vagueness and ensure clarity. Alternatives such as "substantial responsibility" or "significant risk" can offer nuanced variations in meaning, but the core message of substantial burden remains consistent.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

huge obligation

Substitutes 'enormous' with 'huge' and 'liability' with 'obligation', highlighting the mandatory nature of the burden.

substantial responsibility

Replaces 'liability' with 'responsibility' and 'enormous' with 'substantial', focusing on the aspect of duty rather than potential negative consequences.

significant risk

Emphasizes the potential danger or hazard associated with the liability.

considerable burden

Shifts the focus to the onerous aspect of the liability, portraying it as a heavy weight or obligation.

massive debt

Specifically refers to financial liabilities, indicating a large sum of money owed.

tremendous exposure

Highlights the vulnerability to potential losses or damages.

extensive accountability

Focuses on the aspect of being answerable for something on a large scale.

severe encumbrance

Indicates a heavy impediment or obstacle, often of a legal or financial nature.

major drawback

Presents the liability as a significant disadvantage or negative aspect.

critical weakness

Points out the liability as a serious flaw or vulnerability in a system or organization.

FAQs

How can I use "enormous liability" in a sentence?

You can use "enormous liability" to describe a significant risk or responsibility that could lead to negative consequences, often in a legal or financial context. For example: "The product recall created an "enormous liability" for the company."

What are some alternatives to "enormous liability"?

You can use alternatives like "substantial responsibility", "significant risk", or "huge obligation" depending on the specific meaning you want to convey.

Is it better to say "enormous liabilities" or "enormous liability"?

"Enormous liability" refers to a general state of being liable, while "enormous liabilities" refers to specific instances or types of obligations. The choice depends on whether you're discussing a general concept or specific debts/responsibilities.

What's the difference between "enormous liability" and "potential liability"?

"Enormous liability" suggests a known and significant obligation, while "potential liability" refers to a possible future obligation that may or may not materialize. The former implies a current issue, while the latter is about a possible future risk.