Sentence examples for enhancement debate from inspiring English sources

Within the broader biomedical treatment and enhancement debate, several authors have convincingly argued that whereas drastic identity changes are problematic from an ethical perspective, typically requiring the discontinuation of the treatment or intervention, mild or moderate changes are not necessarily ethically problematic (e.g. [ 95]).

This statement has several important features for the enhancement debate.

In the enhancement debate it is important to distinguish the concerns and the arguments that are provided for and against the moral and ethical significance of various types of enhancement.

Each family of theories described above that emphasizes a feature of human nature as the basis for its position in the enhancement debate utilizes a tool that is double-edged.

These mistakes are an obstacle to progress in the human enhancement debate.

I shall now sketch some ways in which liberals in the enhancement debate may adequately respond to Habermas' arguments.

All of these contextual "back-stories" to the contemporary enhancement debates are worth exploring further.

We should understand that the legal rhetoric of a union ideologue like Marvin Miller remains as essential to the performance-enhancement debate as the words of the World Anti-Doping Agency hardliner Dick Pound.

This brings us to our final remark regarding the distinction between treatment and enhancement: more debate is urgently needed on what would be the right kind of response towards those who behave immorally due to pathological deficiencies of their moral capacities: treatment or punishment?

The interpretation of contrast enhancement is still debated [ 38]: in non-cerebellar gliomas, fluctuation of contrast enhancement during follow-up seemed to have no correlation with disease progression in absence of tumor size changes.

We then apply these lessons to other influential figures in the debate about enhancement.