Sentence examples for enhancement arguments from inspiring English sources

An actuator switching policy is used to arrange switching from faulty actuators to healthy ones based on performance enhancement arguments.

Arguably, the cognitive enhancement argument applies not only to non-bodily tools but to bodily tools (e.g. an individual's hands used in tasks of counting) as well.

The main premiss of the cognitive enhancement argument displays the role of tools (pen and paper to perform long multiplications, physical rearrangements of letter tiles to prompt word recall in Scrabble, the nautical slide rule, and the general paraphernalia of language, books, diagrams, and culture) in facilitating and promoting an individual's success in achieving a number of cognitive tasks.

In [12], the authors extended the results in [11] to a general MIMO Gaussian case by adopting the channel-enhancement argument.

I shall now sketch some ways in which liberals in the enhancement debate may adequately respond to Habermas' arguments.

However, the issue of GPMS is one, I suggest, upon which supporters of Habermas arguments and liberals in the enhancement debate can engage in a meaningful debate.

In this article, I suggest that many of the objections that have been made against Habermas' arguments by liberals in the enhancement debate misconstrue his claims.

Finally, in section III, I shall explain how liberals in the enhancement debate might more adequately respond to Habermas' arguments.

In the enhancement debate it is important to distinguish the concerns and the arguments that are provided for and against the moral and ethical significance of various types of enhancement.

It is crucial to acknowledge that in the course of making these arguments, Habermas appeals to two widely drawn distinctions in the enhancement debate, namely the distinction between therapy and enhancement, and the distinction between genetic and environmental enhancements.

To assume without argument that the current levels of some capacity or substance are optimal is a common mistake in the enhancement debate, which has already been diagnosed by Bostrom and Ord.