"What better person to use for reenactment of the rules of engagement than someone who has actually been there..."...
Hate-reading, usually of social media, provides satisfaction from fury-fueled engagement with someone who should theoretically not provide it.
There is a known issue with Sims FreePlay when trying to get engaged with someone you are already living with, causing the engagement to fail.
Likewise, somebody who believes in reading and the power of the look and feel of a page (ie, that the highest engagement occurs when someone reads something), has to argue this proposition.
"Like, maybe me and my friends are going out to celebrate someone's engagement.
You can't all be marrying your best friends!" I scream internally before silently "liking" someone's engagement announcement on Facebook.
It's a lack of imaginative engagement that, coming from someone who went on to become culture secretary, I find quite chilling.
She has written before about a shattering love affair in her early youth, in the war – her fiance wrote to break off their engagement (he had met someone else) just before he was killed in action.
In the room dedicated to Kierkegaard's tormented romance with the teen-age Regine Olsen (his behavior as an "out and out scoundrel," as he put it, forced her to break their engagement, and she married someone else, but they continued to love each other), the illumination comes from a blue window.
He says the "engagement rate" (how often someone interacts with an ad) on the Web is a little more than one percent.
He attempted to make someone's engagement ring disappear, but the trick malfunctioned.
