Sentence examples for engaged substantively from inspiring English sources

In their letter, the charities said they were alarmed that the government had "not engaged substantively with this report and the critical evidence made to it".

Neither had it made any offer to correct the story, as it had been obliged to do under Clause 1 ii)." So the Daily Star "failed to engaged substantively" with Ipso's complaints committee.

Diplomats from two major European allies said this week that China had refused even to "engage substantively" on the issue of sanctions, preferring to continue diplomatic efforts with Tehran.

It is in Brown's interest to go the extra mile in proving genuinely pluralist intent, engaging substantively with progressive opinion of all parties and none.

"I ask Iran to engage substantively" with the United Nations agency "without delay and provide the requested clarifications regarding possible military dimensions to its nuclear program," Mr. Amano said.

His performance made clear that he brings a very different style and approach from that of his predecessor, Ali Larijani, who had taken a tough line but had shown a willingness to engage substantively on the nuclear issue.

It added: "Should this new government choose to engage substantively and seriously to meet its international obligations and find a peaceful solution to this issue, it will find a willing partner in the United States".

"New Hampshire plays a vital role in our nominating system in that — unlike any other primary — it gives voters the opportunity to engage substantively with the candidates on the myriad issues facing our country," explained Tim Miller, a spokesman for Mr. Huntsman.

At the United Nations, Mark Lyall Grant, the British ambassador, confirmed that political directors from the six countries that could approve sanctions against Tehran had consulted by telephone on Wednesday and that China had finally "agreed to engage substantively on the issue".

Situating these results in a broader discussion of phylogenetic methods, I argue that they remain promising tools for historical linguistics, but that their ability to produce robust results depends on linguists engaging substantively with the linguistic entailments of their implementation.

Then comes a significant paragraph in Ipso's ruling - also carried on page 2 in Friday's issue of the Star - that deserves wider attention: "The committee was very concerned that the newspaper had failed to engage substantively with Ipso's investigation into the complaint.