Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Our analysis of clinical endpoints is based on self-reported physician-based diagnoses and therefore at risk of reporting bias.
The annual risk of developing specific CHD endpoints is based on data from the Framingham Heart Study.
The evaluation of most endpoints is based on clearly defined criteria and subgroups are predefined before randomization; however, a major concern regarding the comparison of DoR and DoCB between two treatment groups in a randomized trial is that these values are both post-treatment outcomes, calculated using a subset of responding patients defined post-randomization.
Similar(57)
Current tests for fate endpoints are based on equilibrium situations.
Most efficacy endpoints are based on specified clinical assessments of patients.
Analyses for primary safety study endpoints were based on treatment group-specific summaries of frequency, severity and relationship to product use of AEs.
These endpoints were based on questionnaires and process measures combined.
The description of categorical endpoints was based on absolute and appropriate relative frequencies.
Analyses for primary endpoints were based on the intention-to-treat analysis strategy.
Our definitions of endpoints are based on the intention-to-treat analysis.
These endpoints were based on regular assessments of disease response and progression using RECIST criteria.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com