Sentence examples for enabled reviewers from inspiring English sources

This categorization enabled reviewers to examine and compare which BCTs were associated with studies in these categories.

This enabled reviewers to study not only the contact information of the GP cooperative, but also the medical records of the patients' own GPs, which include information about patients' healthcare use after they contacted the GP cooperative.

The WHO assessment tool also provided an MS Excel spreadsheet file model, which enabled reviewers to choose their response (fully implemented, partially implemented, or not implemented) to each indicator.

The experience of this meta-evaluation has found the qualitative approach to not only have been capable of generating analysis equivalent to or richer than the previous quantified methodology, but that it also enabled reviewers to provide more useful, accurate and constructive feedback to UNICEF managers in a range of contexts.

Following an increasing number of submissions on endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), the Journal of Pediatric Urology sought to establish a quality guideline that would enable reviewers to select the best papers for publication in the journal.

By tradition the identity of reviewers is concealed from the authors of submitted papers but while this enables reviewers to critique freely — an important safeguard particularly — the cloak of anonymity can be abused by reviewers too lazy or preoccupied to do a thorough job or those seeking to settle scores or gain a competitive advantage.

In doing so, we aim to strike a balance between ensuring that the information that led to the decision to publish the paper is freely available, and at the same time enabling reviewers, authors and editors to communicate frankly and privately where necessary.

The score enables reviewers to directly compare and rank studies according to their quality.

This qualitative approach was designed to enable reviewers to provide useful analysis across the range of evaluation contexts encountered; and constructive feedback to improve future evaluation reports.

A very serious limitation of most studies was the lack of sufficient information in the trial report to enable reviewers to determine the risk of bias.

These have been designed to offer guidelines to enable reviewers (with the minimum friction or bias) to follow and apply open science principles, and support the ideas of transparency, reproducibility and ultimately greater societal impact.