Exact(8)
Until Kant's time, all empirical judgments were regarded as vulnerable to skeptical doubt, because human experience is inherently fallible.
But even among professional economists there remain important disagreements, centring mainly on empirical judgments about the stability and form of some of the relations between money and other economic phenomena.
With respect to empirical judgments, considerations of probability are in the foreground.
However, this law also seems to point out the unreliability of empirical judgments.
How can we bring an essentiallly subjective range of judgments nomologically into line with a range of empirical judgments?
So we have a three-fold division: empirical judgments, judgments of taste, and judgments of niceness or nastiness.
In contrast to our normative judgments, our mathematical and empirical judgments, for example, seem to have no intrinsic connection to motivation and action.
Empirical judgments are true just in case they correspond with their empirical objects in accordance with the a priori principles that structure all possible human experience.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com