Exact(4)
In Reference [46], a possible explanation (which is free of disciplines) is given for the emerged mixture type of empirical degree distributions.
However, if sociable researchers only coauthor with sociable ones, then there will exist many sociable researchers, which is against empirical degree distributions.
Furthermore, the empirical degree distribution differed substantially between the two methods.
A Poisson Inverse-Gaussian distribution with mean μ = 19.6 (95 % CI 18.3 21.1) and dispersion parameter λ = 2.0 (95 % CI 1.8 2.1) best fitted the empirical degree distribution.
Similar(56)
We have addressed the question of the number N of data points required to compute a model (an expansion) to degree d with an empirical point of view; indeed, not only the distribution of data points, but also the noise intervene in a broad sense, on the data.
Figure 5B shows the (empirical) node degree distribution of the Jump3 network.
In addition, empirical (statistical) degree-day growing models are frequently used in investigating the bioclimatic changes and carbon sequestration cycles in land surface models (Arora and Boer 2005; Baldocchi et al. 2005; Delpierre et al. 2009; Vitasse et al. 2011).
It only reflects the consequence of an empirical fact, the degree of concavity of individual utility functions.
By regarding the size of executed order as its fitness, the fitness model can reproduce the empirical power-law degree distribution.
To assess to what degree empirical models are isomorphic with physical ones, two magnetospheres are compared: the magnetosphere of Mead and Fairfield [1975] and the physical magnetosphere proposed by Buneman, [1993].
If fG<0.95, the empirical network's degree distribution is not significantly different from the model distribution at the 95% confidence level.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com