Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
A number of authors who have been otherwise critical of the Wager have explicitly conceded that the Wager is valid — e.g. Mackie 1982, Rescher 1985, Mougin and Sober 1994, and most emphatically, Hacking 1972.
Emphatically, no.
Emphatically no.
Emphatically not.
No, emphatically.
"Emphatically, emphatically, emphatically it did not happen.
Emphatically so.
Emphatically yes.
Emphatically beaten.
"No," he said emphatically.
"No," she said, emphatically.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com