emphasizing for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "emphasizing for" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express the act of highlighting or stressing something for a specific purpose or audience, but it lacks clarity. Example: "The report is emphasizing for the need for better communication within the team."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

23 human-written examples

Both are areas that the company is emphasizing for future growth.

The New York Times

ACCURACY -- The positions outlined are restatements of policies that Mr. Bush has been emphasizing for months.

The New York Times

The resolution also establishes what President Obama has been emphasizing for many months: that the use of chemical weapons anywhere constitutes a threat to international peace and security.

The Guardian

In emphasizing for the past few months that a tax cut would help revive the economy, Mr. Bush has left himself open to criticism that his rationale will shift with economic circumstances.

The New York Times

Mr. Stearns also says the meat industry and federal regulators have long tried to shift the responsibility for meat safety to consumers, emphasizing, for instance, that ground beef must be cooked to 160 degrees and checked with a meat thermometer.

The New York Times

The ads, 15 seconds long, hit Mr. Corzine on the themes Mr. Franks has been emphasizing for weeks: that Mr. Corzine is trying to buy the election and that he is deceptive and untrustworthy.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

36 human-written examples

The bad experience emphasized for her the value of boundaries.

The New York Times

"That's what we're trying to emphasize for the Internet".

The New York Times

SADDLERY -- Grain, texture and scarring are emphasized for a rougher character.

The New York Times - Travel

It is crucial, he emphasized, for the classics to coexist with contemporary plays.

The New York Times

Officials had emphasized for days the difficulty of successfully employing the containment dome.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When intending to highlight the reason or beneficiary of emphasis, replace "emphasizing for" with constructions like "emphasizing to" or "emphasizing the importance of" to ensure grammatical accuracy.

Common error

Avoid directly following "emphasize" with "for". While seemingly intuitive in some contexts, it often results in grammatically incorrect sentences. Instead, consider "emphasize the need for", "emphasize to [someone]", or rephrase the sentence entirely.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "emphasizing for" functions as a verb phrase attempting to express the act of highlighting something with a specific purpose or beneficiary in mind. However, as Ludwig AI points out, the construction is often grammatically questionable and lacks clarity.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "emphasizing for" appears in various sources, including news and scientific publications, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically questionable. Its intended purpose is to highlight or stress something for a particular reason, but it often falls short due to incorrect preposition usage. To ensure clarity and grammatical correctness, it is advisable to use alternatives such as "emphasizing to", "emphasizing the importance of", or rephrase the sentence to avoid the problematic construction altogether. Although present in a number of contexts it's not recommended for Formal & Business or Professional communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

emphasizing the importance of

Adds "the importance of" to make the phrase grammatically correct and clearer, specifying what is being emphasized.

stressing the need for

Similar to the previous alternative but uses "stressing" to convey urgency or necessity.

stressing for

Replaces "emphasizing" with "stressing", maintaining a similar meaning with a slight shift in intensity.

placing emphasis on

Transforms the phrase into a more idiomatic expression indicating focus or importance.

highlighting for

Substitutes "emphasizing" with "highlighting", focusing on bringing attention to something for a particular purpose.

underscoring for

Uses "underscoring" instead of "emphasizing", suggesting a stronger degree of highlighting or importance.

emphasizing to

This alternative changes the preposition to "to", which can sometimes fit better depending on the specific context. However, it's not always interchangeable.

laying stress on

An alternative to placing emphasis, conveying a similar meaning with a slightly different construction.

drawing attention to

Shifts the focus to directing attention towards something, rather than direct emphasis.

making a point of

Indicates that something is being deliberately highlighted or emphasized.

FAQs

How can I correct the phrase "emphasizing for" in a sentence?

You can correct "emphasizing for" by replacing it with phrases like "emphasizing the importance of" or "emphasizing to", depending on the intended meaning.

What is a more grammatically sound alternative to "emphasizing for"?

A more grammatically sound alternative would be "highlighting for", or restructuring the sentence to use "emphasizing [something] to [someone]".

Is "emphasizing for" considered grammatically correct in formal writing?

No, "emphasizing for" is generally not considered grammatically correct in formal writing. Alternatives such as "emphasizing the need for" or a complete rephrasing are recommended.

What's the difference between "emphasizing for" and "emphasizing to"?

"Emphasizing for" is generally considered incorrect. "Emphasizing to" is used to indicate who the emphasis is directed towards, while "emphasizing for" doesn't have a clear grammatical function.