But, as is often the case with perception of risk, these emotional filters, more than the facts, determine how afraid we are, or aren't.
We see the facts through instinctive and emotional filters that help us figure out how to protect ourselves, not through some mythical objective reasoning computer-like mind.
The final model has to do with filters how we have psychological, physical, cultural, and emotional filters through which we experience the world out there.
Risk is a feeling, a subjective interpretation of the facts and numbers through a set of subconscious instinctive and emotional filters that can make the same facts seem more scary, or less.
As the debate continues, what is often referred to as a mental state actually reflects the amalgamation of genetic predispositions, epigenetic/cultural influences, sensory inputs, and individual's operational paradigms processed through emotional filters.
We should enter a space of awareness of our present moment with no emotional filters, no regrets of the past or hopes for the future, with no daydreaming and no nightmares.
Treacy's writing expressed an emotional brutalism filtered by the drugged optimism of the Velvet Underground.
Emotional experiences are filtered through an intellectual lens.
In our preliminary experiment, we tried to filter out "emotional noise" from the perspective of conversational content by considering lexical and discourse features such as salient words and repetitions.
The only way to deliver your senses with clean data is to filter the emotional factor out of the equation.
