Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(1)
All illumination experiments were carried out with a 500 W halogen lamp light source (OSRAM, Italy) which emits in the range of 500 750 nm with a peak at 650 nm, as previously described in Sabbahi et al. (2008b).
Similar(59)
Their solutions in tetrahydrofuran absorb electromagnetic radiation in the range of 210 420 nm and emit in the range of 350 600 nm.
The tryptophan residues excite exclusively above 295 nm and emit in the range of 300 to 400 nm [39].
Propidium iodine was bound to isolated nuclei, which were then run on the LSRII flow cytometer, emitting fluorescence in the range of 580 650 nm and equipped with a 585/42 filter to analyze the light emitting between 564 and 606 nm by the stained cells.
By carefully manipulating the manufacturing process, the dots can be made to emit only in the range of wavelengths that can be sent down optical fibres.
Under 292 nm excitation, both BSA and HSA emitted fluorescence in the range of 300 450 nm with a maximum wavelength of 352 nm, which could be quenched by C60 nanoparticles with a dose-effect relationship.
This wavelength was able to significantly excite only the anti-HS-Alexa Fluor 546, which emits their fluorescence in the range of 594 nm.
The prepared N-acylsubstituted dihydrazones emitted light with λem in the range of 499 530 nm in solution, whereas, in solid state as blend with PMMA blue emission was observed.
If the absorber is heated by the sun, it will emit black body radiation in the range of about 5 8 µm wavelength depending on its temperature.
For example, fluorophores excited with a 561-nm laser line emit photons with wavelengths in the range of 570 610 nm, due to energy loss during the fluorescence energy transfer (Stokes Law).
Moreover, thermal cutting of polystyrene foam has been shown to emit nano-sized polymer particles, in the range of 22 220 nm [9] which can enter the soil through atmospheric deposition.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com