emit pollution

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "emit pollution" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that is releasing pollutants into the atmosphere. For example, "The factory is emitting pollution into the air, causing local air quality to decline."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

3. Motor vehicles emit pollution.

The Guardian - Opinion

Perhaps the better President to emulate is George H. W. Bush, who recognized the power of markets when he signed legislation, in 1990, that forced companies to pay for the right to emit pollution linked to acid rain.

The New Yorker

Mr. Schregardus also opposed lawsuits filed by the federal government during the Clinton administration against power plants, many of them in the Midwest, which emit pollution that drifts toward the Northeast.

The New York Times

The State Department of Environmental Protection tonight will hold the first of three public hearings on proposed rules meant to ensure that industries that emit pollution are not disproportionately situated in predominantly black and ethnic communities.

The New York Times

Ms. Hamel, who was leading the negotiations for Massachusetts, said Mr. Romney's chief of staff, Beth Myers, insisted that Mr. Romney would sign on only if the deal included a limit on what power plants would have to pay to emit pollution — a condition that New York and several other states opposed.

The New York Times

VW sold nearly half a million cars in the United States that emit pollution up to 40 times the legal limit.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

Each emits pollution that drifts across state borders, and degrades air quality in New York.

Huffington Post

However, those "freebies" do exact a cost on the planet: Producing them uses resources, transporting them burns fossil fuels and emits pollution, and their packaging is likely to end up in a landfill.

Huffington Post

In many cases local basic engineering firms can be trained to remove toxic soils to landfills and to teach miners, lead battery recyclers and others how to work without emitting pollution.

Huffington Post

In that corridor, where she grew up, are some 150 industrial polluters that emit toxic pollution.

Huffington Post

Power plants that emit carbon pollution and other toxic pollutants disproportionately harm nearby low-income communities and communities of color.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing environmental impact, specify the type of pollution being emitted (e.g., "emit carbon pollution", "emit air pollution") for greater clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "emit pollution" without specifying the source or type of pollution. For example, instead of just saying "the factory emits pollution", specify "the factory emits particulate matter" or "the power plant emits greenhouse gases".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "emit pollution" functions as a verb phrase where "emit" acts as a transitive verb taking "pollution" as its direct object. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used to describe the release of pollutants.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Science

28%

Wiki

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "emit pollution" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to describe the release of pollutants into the environment. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. While frequently found in News & Media and Scientific contexts, it maintains a neutral register suitable for various discussions on environmental issues. To enhance clarity, it's best to specify the type of pollution being emitted. Related phrases such as "release pollutants" or "discharge emissions" can be used as alternatives, depending on the specific nuance you want to convey. By following these guidelines, you can effectively use "emit pollution" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

release pollutants

Focuses on the action of discharging polluting substances.

discharge emissions

Emphasizes the act of releasing something, often in a controlled manner.

discharge toxic substances

Highlights the release of materials that are specifically poisonous or dangerous.

generate contaminants

Highlights the creation and subsequent release of polluting substances.

produce pollutants

Focuses on the creation of pollution as a byproduct.

exude toxins

Implies a gradual release of poisonous substances.

expel waste

Highlights the ejection of unwanted or harmful materials.

vent fumes

Specifically refers to the release of gaseous pollutants.

spew contaminants

Suggests a forceful and uncontrolled release of pollutants.

vent greenhouse gasses

Highlights the release of gasses that specifically affect climate change.

FAQs

What does it mean to "emit pollution"?

To "emit pollution" means to release pollutants or contaminants into the environment, typically into the air, water, or soil. This can come from various sources such as factories, vehicles, or natural processes.

What are common sources that "emit pollution"?

Common sources that "emit pollution" include industrial facilities, power plants, vehicles, agricultural activities, and even household products. The type of pollution varies depending on the source.

What can I say instead of "emit pollution"?

You can use alternatives like "release pollutants", "discharge emissions", or "generate contaminants" depending on the context.

What are the consequences of entities that "emit pollution"?

The consequences of entities that "emit pollution" include environmental degradation, health problems, climate change, and damage to ecosystems. Regulations and policies are often put in place to mitigate these effects.