Sentence examples for emissions courts from inspiring English sources

In each case, starting with the Supreme Court's 5-to-4 ruling this year that the Environmental Protection Agency can regulate heat-trapping emissions, courts have found that federal officials must either grapple with the consequences of climate change or explain why they chose not to.

Poland and Estonia have the right to challenge limits placed by the European Commission on their carbon emissions, a court said Wednesday, in a potential setback to near-term goals for cutting emissions.

Trader Joe's agrees to cut greenhouse gas emissions in court settlement.

Government agencies in Southern California can be forced to give up diesel vehicles and buy alternative-fuel cars, trucks and buses with cleaner emissions, an appeals court has ruled.

"It is only if the operators of such aircraft choose to operate a commercial air route arriving at or departing from an airport situated in the E.U. that they are subject to the emissions trading scheme," the court said.

The ACF will argue, on appeal to the high court, that emissions from the burning of coal dug up from the mine will exacerbate climate change and harm the Great Barrier Reef.

Moreover, even if the CPP struggles in court, carbon emissions from power plants will still be regulated under the Clean Air Act.

Therefore it's the EPA's job, not the job of the courts, to set emissions limits.

That's partially due to similar assertions that, in the US, it's the job of the legislature and existing regulatory bodies (like the Environmental Protection Agency), rather than the courts, to regulate emissions and determine climate change policies.

The Poles have already taken the European Commission to court over their emissions allowance, which they say is unreasonably low.

Republicans have also objected to the act being used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, prompting a US supreme court challenge to the Clean Power Plan.