Sentence examples for eliminating a ban from inspiring English sources

Meanwhile, in February 2008 the parliament voted to amend Turkey's constitution by eliminating a ban barring the head scarf from being worn on university campuses.

Now, under what is advertised as a "clarification" of the law governing surface mining, the administration is eliminating a ban dating from the Reagan era against mining activity within 100 feet of a stream.

The Constitution significantly expands the powers of the federal government, especially the executive branch, while eliminating a ban on presidents immediately seeking re-election and extending their term of office to six years from five.

Many conservative Israelis want the government to assert its sovereignty at the plaza by allowing visits of politicians and eliminating a ban on non-Muslim prayer.

It also eliminated a ban on the reclassification of documents and information already released; reversed a Carter provision that forbade the classification of a document after a request for it had been made; reversed a willingness to resolve doubts in favor of declassification; and curtailed declassification-review practices in the National Archives and other executive agencies and departments.

Now the former army colonel, who will be 46 on Friday, seems assured of at least six more years in office, thanks to provisions in the new charter that extend the presidential term by one year and eliminate a ban on immediate re-election.

In exceptional cases, Wada has the power to eliminate a ban entirely and offer complete confidentiality for substantial assistance," it said.

In 2002, Georgia Sen. Max Cleland, a decorated veteran and triple amputee, in effect had his patriotism challenged (he had voted for an amendment to the Chemical Weapons Treaty that eliminated a ban on citizens of terrorist nations being on U.N. inspection teams in Iraq – i.e., he was "soft on terrorism").

But such inefficiency is no longer necessary, thanks to the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which cemented the idea of political spending as free speech, eliminating a longstanding ban on corporate political spending and effectively ending limits on how much individuals can give to PACs as well.

But such inefficiency is no longer necessary, thanks to the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which cemented the idea of political spending as free speech, eliminating a longstanding ban on corporate political spending and effectively ending limits on how much individuals can give to PACs as well.

Mr. Hikind and other lawmakers have sought unsuccessfully for about 10 years to adopt the new criteria by amending the Tuition Assistance Program rules, eliminating a long-established ban on state tuition assistance for undergraduate students who attend religious schools, like yeshivas, that are not chartered by the state Board of Regents.