Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

eligible for reporting

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "eligible for reporting" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that meets the criteria or requirements to be included in a report or documentation. Example: "Only those transactions that are eligible for reporting will be included in the final audit."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

ALS cases meeting the El Escorial criteria, who resided in SFBA or LA and who were diagnosed or under the care of a neurologist between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2011, were eligible for reporting.

The scope of the Italian reporting system is the broadest compared to other systems considered in this study, since there are no limitations with regard to the type of drugs included in the reporting system, and all stakeholders of the health care system are eligible for reporting.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

A similar phase II study was published in 1996 on 46 patients with advanced HCC not eligible for surgery, reporting an overall tumor response rate of 24% and a tumor control rate of 63% [ 6]. 13% of patients obtained a complete response with a median duration of 19 months and a median survival of 27 months compared with 4 months in the 37% of patients with progressive disease.

Science

BMC Cancer

Indeed, only 21 of the 41 studies (51%) that were eligible for entry reported morbidity data.

Science

Cancer

The incidence of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in younger patients has rapidly increased [ 3, 4] and only about every second patient considered eligible for TKA reported pain of about 50 or worse on a 0 to 100 scale [ 2], suggesting a broadening of indications to include also younger patients with less severe symptoms.

In the 2-week pre-treatment period, patients eligible for randomisation reported an average daily abdominal pain score of ≥3 (on a numerical rating scale ranging from 1 to 10) and an average of <3 CSBMs and ≤5 SBMs per week.

We also scanned the reference lists of key review articles that were identified in our electronic searching and all articles eligible for our report.

One hundred and three trials (70%) reported the number of individuals assessed by investigators for eligibility, 119 (80%) reported the number eligible for participation, and all reported the actual number recruited.

One hundred and three RCTs (70%) reported the number of individuals assessed by investigators for eligibility, 119 (80%) reported the number eligible for participation, and all reported the actual number recruited (Table 2).

Among the total of 4,385 respondents eligible for analysis, 3,511 reported a negative last HIV test result or no previous HIV test, and 874 reported a positive HIV test result.

About 2120 eligible participants reported for screening in the four regions including 649 (30.6%) in the Centre, 1167 (54.1%) in the Littoral and 304 (14.3%) in the West and North West regions.

Science

BMJ Open
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When determining if something is "eligible for reporting", clearly define the criteria or standards that must be met. This ensures consistency and accuracy in your reports.

Common error

Ensure you thoroughly understand all the criteria that determine whether something is "eligible for reporting". Failing to do so can lead to inaccurate or incomplete reports, potentially affecting decisions based on that information.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "eligible for reporting" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun and indicating that something meets the necessary criteria to be included in a report. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "eligible for reporting" is used to describe something that meets the requirements for inclusion in a report. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usefulness. It's commonly found in scientific, news, and formal business contexts. When using this phrase, make sure you understand and apply the relevant eligibility criteria to ensure the accuracy and relevance of your reports. Some good alternatives include ""qualified to be reported"", "suitable for reporting", and "reportable".

FAQs

How to use "eligible for reporting" in a sentence?

You can use "eligible for reporting" to describe data or events that meet specific criteria for inclusion in a formal report. For example, "Only expenses exceeding $100 are "qualified to be reported"".

What can I say instead of "eligible for reporting"?

You can use alternatives like ""qualified to be reported"", "suitable for reporting", or "reportable" depending on the context.

What criteria determine if something is "eligible for reporting"?

The criteria for being "eligible for reporting" depend on the specific context and regulations. They may include factors like materiality, relevance, compliance with accounting standards, or legal requirements.

What happens if something isn't "eligible for reporting"?

If something isn't "eligible for reporting", it should typically be excluded from the report, unless otherwise required by specific guidelines or regulations. Excluding non-eligible items helps maintain the accuracy and focus of the report.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: