Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Studies reviewed Of 4235 studies reviewed for eligibility, quality, and data extraction, 84 were included in the final analysis.
Similar(59)
Review methods Two authors independently assessed the studies for eligibility and quality (using criteria adapted from the Newcastle-Ottawa quality scale) and extracted data.
Two reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility and quality of randomized controlled trials.
Those who pass a preliminary screening for eligibility and quality will then be invited to submit a more detailed proposal.
Studies were evaluated for eligibility and quality, and data were abstracted on study design, demographics, intervention or predictor factor, and cognitive outcomes.
Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility and quality.
Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of the studies.
A systematic search followed by assessment of eligibility and quality.
From 5,180 identified studies, 39 met eligibility and quality criteria.
77,719 (21.3%) participants returned questionnaires and passed eligibility and quality control checks.
The review authors resolved disagreements about eligibility and quality by consensus.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com