Sentence examples for eligibility for intervention from inspiring English sources

At each follow-up, we collect measures to assess the eligibility for intervention as well as primary and secondary outcomes.

We did not set an upper age limit to eligibility for intervention because physical activity is beneficial even in old age [ 28].

As the lower age limit for eligibility for intervention was raised, first to 40 years and then to 50 years, then gain in QALYs associated with intervention increased, while the incremental costs per 1,000 participants showed little change.

Even in the most favourable scenario, where the eligibility for intervention was restricted to the age range 50 to 74 years, the probability of the intervention being cost-effective was less than 60% at a threshold of £30,000 per QALY, with little impact from increasing the threshold value.

In brief, image studies and pathological findings of all patients who received evaluation or treatment with LC at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were assessed, and patients' eligibility for intervention, including surgery, adjunctive/palliative chemotherapy, irradiation therapy, and/or target therapy, was evaluated based on the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (7th edition) criteria [ 33].

Image studies and pathological findings of all patients who presented with LC at the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were evaluated, and patients' eligibility for interventions, including surgery, adjunctive/palliative chemotherapy, irradiation therapy, and/or target therapy, was based on the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer AJCCC) staging criteria [ 28].

In theory, insurance status (Medicaid participation versus having private insurance) should not be expected to influence therapy utilization for infants and toddlers eligible for early intervention since eligibility for early intervention is not contingent on health insurance access.

According to Wisconsin mandates for early intervention, the PEDI is an accepted tool to determine eligibility for early intervention [ 25].

As the Bayley scores are often used to determine eligibility for early intervention services, the use of the Bayley-III may result in the lack of qualification for early intervention programmes of infants that would have been previously eligible.

Currently, only some states ― and not Illinois ― offer automatic eligibility for early intervention to lead-exposed children, despite the recommendation by a group of experts in a 2015 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that lead-exposed children should have streamlined access to assessment, intervention and special education services.  .

After giving consent, participants completed screening instruments, which included the following to assess eligibility for an intervention based on set thresholds: AUDIT-C (for alcohol), HSI (for smoking), IPAQ (for exercise) and a subset of DINE (for diet).