Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
The manipulation of the primes was successful in eliciting larger activity for adjective-noun combinations than single nouns in left anterior temporal and ventromedial prefrontal cortices, replicating prior MEG studies on parallel contrasts.
Vowel discrimination was noted for /ba/ versus /bu/ syllables, with the latter eliciting larger amplitudes over right posterior temporal locations, t (7) = 2.53, p < 0.04.
Moreover, Santesso et al. (2012) suggested that FRN amplitude variation might be context-dependent, with negatively-valenced contexts eliciting larger FRN amplitudes.
At temporal location (figure 5), an interaction between stimulus and hemisphere (F2,18 = 4.69, p <.05) was obtained, frequent word eliciting larger negativity that infrequent word and pseudoword but only in the left hemisphere (p <.01).
Additionally, these babies generated anterior posterior temporal differences over the right hemisphere with /da/ eliciting larger amplitudes at posterior locations, t (7) = 2.6, p < 0.04, an effect that was not present in babies in the nonsmoking group.
The analyses also revealed differential amplitude for neutral/ happy versus fearful facial expressions, with fearful expressions eliciting larger positivity at N290 and P400 latency ranges, Fs 1, 77) > 11.9, ps ≤.001, partial η =.07 .16.
Similar(54)
Female faces elicited larger N290 amplitudes than male faces.
Labial glides (Experiment 1) and fricatives (Experiment 2) elicited larger Mismatch responses than their coronal counterparts.
Classic N170 category sensitivity was observed in both participant groups, whereby faces elicited larger amplitudes than all other visual categories, and inverted faces elicited larger amplitudes and slower latencies than upright faces.
In contrast, motion elicited larger amplitude and more anteriorly distributed N1 components in deaf than hearing participants.
In addition, natural stimuli elicited larger P600 and were associated with shorter RTs than artifactual stimuli in the categorization task.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com