Sentence examples for elicited significant differences between from inspiring English sources

Moreover, a recent fNIRS study revealed that the word-frequency effect elicited significant differences between low and high-frequency words for decreases in [deoxy-Hb], while [oxy-Hb] changes only showed a nonsignificant trend (Hofmann et al. 2008).

As for SCRs, one peak was recognized on the average waveform that was at 1.03 ± 0.18 s.> The early and middle ERP peaks elicited significant differences between males and females with respect to peak amplitude, with females showing greater absolute responses, as shown below.

With regard to impairment on activities of daily living, depression (adjusted mean ± SE, 59.4 ± 2.6%) and AR (27.8 ± 1.3%) displayed higher scores, eliciting significant differences between depression and the three other groups, as well as between AR and hypertension (19.8 ± 1.6%) but not between AR and DM (25.7 ± 1.6%; Table 5).

The AG was the sole brain region which elicited significant differences in activity between all three conditions, with concrete words eliciting greater activation than both abstract and pseudowords.

Nevertheless, cortical activations during low-frequency L1 and L2 word tasks elicited significant differences.

Perhaps the difference in exercise intensities for the two sessions was not substantial enough to elicit significant differences, such as those found in the current study.

Futures studies with larger samples should elicit significant differences as demonstrated previously.

Fasting glucose (163 ± 25 mg/dL versus 154 ± 14 mg/dL) and insulin (1.6 ± 0.6 versus 2.1 ± 1.0) levels did not differ between the groups, and glucose tolerance testing (performed after 10 weeks of high-fat feeding) did not elicit any significant differences between the two groups of mice (Supporting Fig. 6B).

Table  3 shows the questions that elicited some of the most significant differences between last place of care.

Trigeminal PREPs and nBR were elicited using similar current intensities without significant differences between patients after both, anodal tDCS and sham stimulation, compared to baseline conditions (Figure 3, Table 3).

We found large, statistically significant differences between utility elicited by SF-6D (0.171), EQ-5D (0.114), and TTO (0.151) and the reference measure, SG.