Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(57)
He pressed resolutions for constitutional amendments to provide for popular election of senators (then elected by state legislatures) and of the president (chosen by the Electoral College), and limiting the tenure of federal judges to 12 years.
This is what happened in the early 20th century, when the various state legislators asked the U.S. Senate to approve a proposed amendment calling for the direct election of Senators.
The year 2013 also marks the centennial of the 17th Amendment, which ushered in huge changes by mandating the direct election of Senators -- and also made it clear that sweeping reform of the Senate is indeed possible.
Until recently, he supported repealing the 17th Amendment, which provides for direct election of senators.
(The Constitution was amended to require direct election of senators in 1913).
He opposed the 17th Amendment to the Constitution, which mandated popular election of senators.
He says the constitutional amendments establishing the federal income tax and allowing the popular election of Senators were mistakes.
More than 100 years ago, hot-button issues included direct election of senators and a federal income tax.
I certainly don't think they would have the authority to expel the federal judiciary from the election of senators, representatives.
It builds on the 17th Amendment, ratified in 1913, which first provided for the direct election of senators.
Similar(1)
The bill's prospects have been boosted by the re-election of senators David Leyonhjelm and Bob Day, who both support it.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com