Suggestions(2)
Exact(15)
The MAPS statement is best applied in conjunction with the accompanying MAPS Explanation and Elaboration paper.
The SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and Elaboration paper, together with the Statement, should help with the drafting of trial protocols.
This SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and Elaboration paper provides important information to promote full understanding of the checklist recommendations.
The Explanation and Elaboration paper provides exemplars of good reporting practice identified from the published literature for each reporting item.
The development of the MAPS reporting statement, and of its Explanation and Elaboration paper, was framed by recently published guidance for health research reporting guidelines [ 5].
The Explanation and Elaboration paper also summarizes the characteristics of the Delphi panellists and provides detailed statistics for item ratings at each Delphi round.
Similar(45)
A detailed explanatory Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) paper is planned to be developed concurrently with the reporting guideline.
The aim of this program of research is to develop a reporting guideline (GREET statement) and an explanation and elaboration (E&E) paper to enable the consistent and transparent reporting of EBP educational interventions and teaching.
The aim of this program of research is to develop the Guideline for Reporting EBP Educational interventions and Teaching (GREET) statement and an accompanying explanation and elaboration (E&E) paper.
The main outputs are the SPIRIT 2013 Statement, 14 consisting of a 33 item checklist of minimum recommended protocol items (table 1) plus a diagram (fig1); and this accompanying Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) paper.
In response to observed deficiencies in protocol content, the SPIRIT Initiative has produced recommendations for minimum relevant protocol items to include in a protocol, published in the form of the SPIRIT 2013 Statement and this Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) paper.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com