Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(8)
"People look at it and they either say that's not for me, or they go 'wow' and want to see it".
So you can either say that electrons are very, very tiny or that they're never ending, and both are pretty accurate ways to think about what an atom is.
The speaker can either say that something IS or IS NOT in a categorical way, or take up an intermediate position between these two poles through the use of MODALITY (therefore the name of 'hedges', (cf. Crompton 1997, Hyland 1996, 1994, Markkanen and Schröder 1997)), as shown in the following two examples.
When you cure a man who has a wound on his forehead, you can either say that you cure him or his whole body, but not that you cure his eyes or his belly, which, like his forehead, are parts of his body (Ramus, Dialectica 1569, p. 487).
These interpretations fall broadly into two types, depending on their view of the unitary evolution of the quantum state (e.g., evolution according to the Schroedinger equation): they either say that there is something more than the quantum state, or that the unitary evolution is not entirely correct.
Since every ordinary object is in only one of the concrete worlds, Lewis must either say that each such object has all its properties essentially or else adopt a treatment of modality de re that is not parallel to the KP treatment.
Similar(52)
Depending on how you interpret the ad, Rudy's either saying that Muslims as a people have been 'perverted' or the people of Pakistan are perverted.
He either says that or he says, "Oh, you're being political".
Further, when asked where they had acquired the information, they either said that they did not know, or they confabulated the source.
For a while Downing Street and the Home Office were not so sure either, saying that Blears' comments were not 'policy'policy
But he was not effusive in his praise, either, saying that he had "a certain hope" based on the choice of the name Benedict.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com