Therefore, the Buddha and Mahāvīra could not be free from these faults either, and hence their words cannot be trusted.
Since, as we have seen, relativized beliefs are not in conflict with one another, arguments in favor of them are not in conflict either, and hence neither the beliefs themselves nor the arguments in favor of them can be weaker or stronger than one another.
Also if only one of them, say p i, is smaller and the other is larger than α, then, since otherwise the Bonferroni test in step (iii) would have rejected H i. In that case the Simes test cannot reject H i either and hence both remaining hypotheses must be retained.
The remainder are either unicameral, and hence have no upper house at all, or apply a version of the so-called "one-and-a-half house" approach.
However, treatment-related mortality occurred in patients prescribed either regimen, and hence physicians need to guard against infectious complications in patients treated with these protocols.
However, GPC probabilistic predictors did not correlate with IQ in either group and hence are unlikely to have affected the findings.
However, as CsA was a better inhibitor of glutamate-induced necrosis than either FK506 (and hence calcineurin inhibition) or L-NAME (and hence NO synthase inhibition), and the extra inhibition is not explained by CyP-D inhibition, it appears that inhibition of extramitochondrial CyPs may also play a role in CsA-mediated protection against glutamate-induced necrosis.
In contrast, a brain area representing the physical structure of the stimulus (rather than the percept) should respond equally to crowded and uncrowded trials for either stimulus, and hence produce a PI of zero. Figure 4C clearly shows that the PI is above zero for all visual areas but also increases from V1 to V4.
In other words, I(– a j) belongs to either or and hence (– a j 1, I(– a j)) acts on βπ as a join and the cycles in (βπΓ I(– a j), βπΓ(– a j 1))(–a j 1, I(– a j)) βπ are admissible.
Languages are either inter-translatable and hence not radically different from ours, or incommensurable and beyond our ability to recognize them as languages (Davidson 1974).
We can easily suppose changes in either our eyes (and hence in normal observers) or in standard viewing conditions, such that some objects that previously were yellow would look red, and others would still look yellow while remaining otherwise physically unchanged.
