egregious amount of

USAGE SUMMARY

"egregious amount of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something large in magnitude or intensity, usually something negative. For example, "The factory was fined an egregious amount of money for its lack of environmental compliance."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

"We consumed an egregious amount of alcohol on the trip," Mr. Trombley said.

The New York Times

In all, Mr. Kozlowski made "an egregious amount of money," said Judith Fischer, managing director of Executive Compensation Advisory Services, a research company in Alexandria, Va.

The New York Times

And he acknowledged at the time the payout was "an egregious amount of money," but justifiable: "It's not like I flew in here on a private jet three years ago and prettied up the company and then booted it out of here".

The New York Times

It still costs an egregious amount of money at $450 and you still have to get your power brick modified for $25 by sending it in or shelling out an extra $100 for a modified brick.

TechCrunch

The change has given rise to protests, people have been kicked out of their homes, much of the city's artistic population has had to relocate elsewhere, and yet the city still sees an egregious amount of homeless people and members living on its margins.

TechCrunch

It has had an egregious amount of time to do so.

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

Today, the work is exponentially more complicated with increasingly complex financial instruments, the intransigence of the bonus culture and the egregious amounts of money at stake.

The New York Times

In any case, Cinco de Mayo will not find me marking the day in any special manner, nor using it to justify guzzling egregious amounts of alcohol.

Huffington Post

HopeFyrey the Festmakers will forally gethosethe bottom of who all those fleeing Fyre Festival attendees were locked inside an airport overnight, too.

Vice

Mr. Brown said that "if the complaint is egregious, or a large amount of money is involved or there is a pattern of complaints" against a business, his office will bring a lawsuit.

The New York Times

Mr Weiss says this is "because conduct is more and more egregious, and the amounts of losses have become so huge".The rise in the number and size of lawsuits probably means that rates for D&O coverage will firm up.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "egregious amount of" to emphasize not just the size of something but also its unacceptability or offensiveness. This phrase is most effective when you want to express strong disapproval or criticism regarding a large quantity.

Common error

Avoid using "egregious amount of" when a neutral description of quantity is needed. The phrase carries a negative connotation and is unsuitable for objective reporting or contexts where disapproval is not intended.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "egregious amount of" functions primarily as an intensifier modifying a noun. It highlights that the noun is present in a quantity or degree that is shockingly bad or excessive, conveying a strong negative sentiment. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable nature.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Wiki

15%

Science

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "egregious amount of" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to denote a quantity that is shockingly bad or unacceptable. Ludwig AI confirms this. Predominantly found in News & Media, it serves to express disapproval or criticism regarding a particular amount. While versatile, it's important to avoid its use in neutral contexts where a negative sentiment is not intended. Alternatives such as "outrageous quantity of" or "excessive quantity of" can be considered depending on the desired nuance. When you want to emphasize that something isn't just large, but also deeply wrong, "egregious amount of" is the phrase to use.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

outrageous quantity of

Replaces 'egregious' with 'outrageous', suggesting a shocking or unacceptable degree.

excessive quantity of

Uses 'excessive' instead of 'egregious', focusing on the exceeding of reasonable limits.

unreasonable volume of

Substitutes 'egregious' and 'amount' with 'unreasonable' and 'volume', implying a lack of justification.

inordinate sum of

Replaces 'egregious amount' with 'inordinate sum', suitable when referring to money or abstract values.

unconscionable level of

Uses 'unconscionable' to emphasize the moral reprehensibility of the amount.

astronomical number of

Implies a very large, almost unbelievable quantity.

exorbitant quantity of

Replaces 'egregious' with 'exorbitant', indicating an amount that is unreasonably high, especially in price.

disproportionate quantity of

Highlights the imbalance or lack of proportion in the amount.

immoderate quantity of

Uses 'immoderate' to suggest a lack of restraint or moderation.

colossal measure of

Emphasizes the vastness or hugeness of the amount, replacing 'egregious' with 'colossal'.

FAQs

What does "egregious amount of" mean?

The phrase "egregious amount of" refers to a quantity or degree that is shockingly bad or obviously wrong, often implying a sense of outrage or disapproval.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "egregious amount of"?

Use "egregious amount of" when you want to emphasize that something is not only large but also unacceptable or morally offensive. It's suitable for expressing strong disapproval or criticism.

What are some alternatives to "egregious amount of"?

You can use alternatives like "outrageous quantity of", "excessive quantity of", or "unreasonable volume of" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "egregious" always negative?

Yes, "egregious" always carries a negative connotation. It describes something remarkably bad or shocking. Therefore, combining it with "amount of" invariably implies a negative overabundance.