Sentence examples for efficient review from inspiring English sources

Matson isn't the only academic to benefit from what might be generously referred to as an "extremely efficient" review process.

We propose a machine-learning approach to facilitate qualitative analysis by selecting content for efficient review.

Organization of trial records and interpretation of results are essential for efficient review of data packages by regulatory authorities and accurate communication of results to the industry.

But one would hope that with experience, that the regulatory agencies would acknowledge the fact that when the company submits data showing that the gene construct is safe and that the sequence is maintained over multiple generations, and that the composition of the food is the same that that should facilitate a reasonable review, an efficient review.

This paper introduces a practical and efficient review framework for extremely large corpora of literature, refined by five parallel implementations within a multi-disciplinary project aiming to map out the research and practice landscape of modelling, simulation, and management methods, spanning a variety of sectors of application where such methods have made a significant impact.

SJES is committed to a high-quality, efficient review process with a first round response time of about 2 months.

An electronic submission and peer-review system guarantees a rapid and efficient reviewing process, and there are no length limitations for text, figures and additional material.

Individuals designated F have VDR proteins missing three amino acids (424 amino acids) and those designated f have longer VDR proteins (427 amino acids) that have been shown to be functionally less efficient (reviewed in Uitterlinden et al. (2004)).

The function of these binding sites seems to be to produce a concentrated cloud of the factors around the entrances of the NPC to make the various processes of cargo loading and release more efficient (reviewed in Strambio-de-Castillia et al. 2010; Wente and Rout 2010).

RCA allowed a more time-efficient review of a registrar's clinical knowledge and reasoning than DO.

At the outset of PPH's initiative, very few staff had the requisite skills to conduct efficient and effective reviews of the literature but by 2010 a large number of staff had participated in EIDM training workshops and plans were underway for an organization-wide training platform.