efficient as had

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "efficient as had" is not correct and does not make sense in written English.
It seems to be an incomplete or incorrect expression that lacks clarity and context. Example: "The process was efficient as had been expected, but it still required adjustments."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The adaptive split menu was not as efficient as had been thought.

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Reducing the number of long trips observed improved the information gained per day at sea but otherwise the PPS method proved not to be as statistically efficient as had been hoped mainly because catch and effort by the NE coast fleet were not accurately foretold by historical data.

Fisheries Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Tenant farming can be highly efficient, as has been demonstrated in the United Kingdom and in the midwestern United States.

Britannica

He pointed to studies showing that four-person crews were only 65 percent as efficient as having five firefighters in a team.

The New York Times

We set two integers to be the same value, i.e., (N_1=N_2=25) since the corresponding methods are both efficient as have been declared by many Mathematicians.

Mathematical Sciences

This result supports that intramolecular genome linkage is very efficient, as has been reported [5], [24].

Plosone

Transposon-mediated IM may be more widely applicable and is highly efficient, as has been shown in Caenorhabtidis elegans and Drosophila [ 16, 17].

Breast Cancer Research

A tiny arrangement of flowers placed very well are often right as efficient as having lots of flowers.

WikiHow

Meanwhile, Eureka's development of its "revolutionary" engine has not proved as efficient as Eureka had hoped.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

(iZettle has since created a slightly less efficient workaround, as have its competitors).

TechCrunch

It is amazing how having a child makes you so much more efficient as you have to get done in three hours what you might normally have got done in three days.

HuffPost

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing efficiency, always specify the benchmark clearly. Instead of "efficient as had", use phrases like "as efficient as expected" or "as efficient as designed" to provide a precise comparison.

Common error

Don't use incomplete comparisons like "efficient as had". This phrase lacks a clear reference point, making the comparison unclear. Always complete the comparison with a specific benchmark, such as "as efficient as planned" or "as efficient as before".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "efficient as had" functions as an incomplete comparative adjective phrase. Ludwig AI indicates this phrase is not grammatically correct and needs completion to make sense. Proper usage requires specifying what the efficiency is being compared to.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

25%

News & Media

25%

Academia

17%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

17%

Wiki

16%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "efficient as had" is grammatically incorrect because it represents an incomplete comparison. Ludwig AI confirms this, indicating that the phrase requires completion to make logical sense. Correct usage involves specifying what the efficiency is being compared to, such as "as efficient as expected" or "as efficient as planned". While examples exist in varied contexts like science, news and media, and academia, clarity is crucial for effective communication. When writing, make sure to specify clearly what you are comparing the efficiency to, avoiding ambiguous phrases like "efficient as had".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

as efficient as expected

Uses "expected" to specify the benchmark for efficiency, replacing "had" with a clearer comparative element.

as efficient as designed

Specifies the design parameters as the standard for comparison, rather than a past action indicated by "had".

as efficient as it should be

Emphasizes the ideal level of efficiency, replacing the past tense "had" with a conditional expectation.

as efficient as previously

Uses "previously" to refer to a past state of efficiency, providing a clearer comparison than "had".

as efficient as before

A simpler way to indicate a past level of efficiency for comparison.

as efficient as it used to be

Clearly indicates a comparison with a past, typical state of efficiency.

as efficient as initially planned

Focuses on the original plan as the point of comparison, offering more clarity.

not as efficient as intended

Expresses a lack of efficiency relative to an intended goal.

less efficient than anticipated

Replaces the grammatical structure entirely, using "less efficient than" for a clearer comparison.

more efficient than before

Indicates an improvement in efficiency compared to a previous state.

FAQs

How can I correctly use "efficient as" in a sentence?

To correctly use "efficient as", complete the comparison with a specific standard. For example, "as efficient as expected", "as efficient as designed", or "as efficient as it used to be" are all grammatically sound.

What's a better way to phrase "efficient as had"?

Instead of "efficient as had", consider using phrases like "as efficient as expected" or "as efficient as planned" to make your comparison clearer.

Is "efficient as had" grammatically correct?

No, "efficient as had" is not grammatically correct. It's an incomplete comparison. You need to specify what the efficiency is being compared to, such as "as efficient as it should be".

What does "efficient as had" try to convey, and how can I express it better?

"Efficient as had" often attempts to compare the current efficiency to a past expectation or state. You can express this more clearly with phrases like "as efficient as before" or "as efficient as initially planned".