Sleep-based statistics included sleep percent (average of the percentage of minutes scored as sleep), and sleep efficiency (proportion of the total sleep time to time in bed), and average daily sleep time (sleep time; average daily minutes scored as sleep).
The first method led to similar drug loads in all the hydrogels, with minor drug loss during the washing steps to remove unreacted monomers, while the second method evidenced the influence of structural parameters on the loading efficiency (proportion of CD units, mesh size, swelling degree).
Efficiency (proportion of reinforced responses) may be recovered from these plots as the length of the dotted line above cumulative distributions (1 - y when x = T).
There was no increase in total sleep, but increases in sleep efficiency (proportion of time in bed spent asleep) averaged 15%.
Similarly, endophyte transmission efficiency (proportion of endophyte-infected seeds per pot) as affected by host genetic background and herbicide dose was analyzed for the endophyte-infected crosses.
Efficiency (proportion of reinforced responses) may be directly recovered from these plots as 1 - B(T) where B T) is the ordinate corresponding to an abscissa of x = T, designated by the vertical dotted lines.
We calculated the participation rate (number who agreed to participate over the total number approached)[ 10], and the recruitment efficiency (proportion of completed data submissions as a function of the number of letters sent)[ 9].
A general linear model was fitted to generate least-square means and SEs of sleep efficiency (proportion of the sleep period spent asleep) across caregivers' education levels adjusting for children's age, sex, disability type, caregiver child relationship and caregivers' age.
The value with parenthesis describes the recruiting efficiency proportion (Percentage of the participants to the eligible patients) The study size – as measured by the ratio of participants (cohort F) to the source population (cohort A) – was 37.3% over all tumour entities based on 4,285 completed self-administered questionnaires.
Removal efficiencies (proportion of material removed from the road) in real-world conditions have been measured as being as low as 10% (Selbig and Bannerman 2007).
