Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
After establishing the best protocols for each cryoprotectant, their efficacy was compared by examining the in vivo fertilizing capacity of the semen samples.
Similar(59)
Clinical efficacy was compared between the CT and DT groups using three different social phobia scales.
The efficacy of mapping was compared by analyzing three combinations of parameters: mismatch cost, insertion cost, deletion cost, matching length and similarity.
The efficacy between 1416 and VER was compared by Gaddum/Schild EC50 shift (GraphPad Prism5.01).
Protective efficacy of the 2 vaccines was compared by analyzing neutralizing antibodies against both of the JEV strains in the vaccines.
Student attitudinal outcomes such as motivations, interests, or self-efficacy could also be compared by the classroom discourse patterns revealed by CDAT.
The efficacy of shampoos can be compared by combining squamometry and semiquantitative evaluations of the number of yeasts.
Two groups were compared by t-test.
Group means were compared by factorial ANOVA.
Htt levels were compared by chemiluminescence densitometry.
Proportions were compared by Chi-square analysis.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com