Sentence examples for efficacy suppression from inspiring English sources

Although 150 mg and 200 mg q2w were reasonably similar in efficacy, suppression of neutrophil counts and some safety parameters were less marked in the 150 mg q2w group.

Current guidelines suggest the use of benzodiazepines as short-term concomitant therapy with recommended first-line antidepressants to speed onset of efficacy, suppression of increased anxiety associated with initiation of serotonergic therapy, and/or short-term relief for crises; long-term use of benzodiazepines is recommended for patients deemed refractory to other available therapies [ 10, 11].

4B and 4D indicate that under higher susceptibility the addition of anger diminishes the efficacy of suppression but does not render it counterproductive.

Co-inoculation of effective type I IFNs (total 400μg/ mouse) resulted in abrogation of the antiviral efficacy and suppression of disease previously observed in this model (5, 8).

Because of its potential efficacy in suppression of the deregulated STAT3 activation and low toxicity profile, lupeol may emerge as a novel candidate for HCC therapy.

Combined therapy with ginsenoside Rg3 and gemcitabine not only enhanced efficacy on suppression of tumor growth and prolongation of the survival, but also increased necrosis rate of tumor significantly.

It was speculated that metastatic OS cells express phosphorylated Ezrin only early after arrival in the lung, and this causes limited efficacy of suppression of Ezrin in readily established metastases, since its essential function in metastasis, namely connecting with the target organ site had already been fulfille [ 21].

Considering the fact that variations exist in the experimentally measured suppression efficacy, we decided to remove some shRNAs whose efficacy are in the range near 70% in hope of ensuring the validity of the dataset.

It was not clear whether the passage of time alone accounted for the increased inhibitor efficacy, or whether suppression of eCBmGluR by DAGL inhibition was use-dependent, i.e., whether it was enhanced by repetitive stimulation.

Without any removal range, all the shRNAs whose ΔGas-7 >= -6.6 or ΔGss-6 >= -7.0 or both have averaged suppression efficacy of 76.98%, while those shRNAs with no high energy state at either end have averaged suppression efficacy of 65.83%.

The latter was found to outperform Nafion in terms of lowest attainable background signal (suppression efficacy) and dynamic suppression range.