Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
The efficacy consisted of RR, DCR, PFS and OS.
The PP population for efficacy consisted of 120 patients who received both study radiopharmaceuticals and completed all required study procedures including scintigraphic imaging without major protocol violations: 59 patients in the treatment sequence Scintimun® first and 61 patients in the sequence 99mTc-HMPAO-labelled WBCs first.
Similar(58)
The GSE-questionnaire operationalizes the psychological construct „self efficacy", consisting of 10 items ranging from 1 = Not at all true, 2 = Hardly true, 3 = Moderately true to 4 = Exactly true.
Susceptibility of breast cancer consisted of three items scored from 3 to 15, seriousness of breast cancer consisted of six items scored from 6 to 30, BSE benefits consisted of four items scored from 4 to 20, BSE barriers consisted of eight items scored from 8 to 40 and BSE self-efficacy consisted of 10 items scored from 10 to 50.
Determinants, such as awareness, attitudes, perceived norms and self-efficacy, consist of specific beliefs: thoughts, associations, perceptions, et cetera.
Self-efficacy consists of cognitive, emotional and behavioural components that are interrelated and affect each other.
The formal efficacy analysis consisted of a set of analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs), one for each efficacy endpoint.
The primary efficacy dataset consisted of all randomly assigned patients who took ≥1 dose of double-blind study medication.
The efficacy population consisted of 2536 patients, after exclusion of 136 (5.1%) patients from the safety population, most commonly because of age < 35 years (n = 119).
The efficacy set consisted of 23 male and 16 female patients, median age 58.6, 95% ECOG score ≤1, 74% with colon cancer, and 26% with rectal cancer.
In the pivotal trial, the primary efficacy population consisted of 59 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com